Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Tayrac, Renaud de; Mathe, M.; Bader, G.; Deffieux, X.; Fazel, Ali; Fernandez, H.

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.015

Cited by 53 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sixteen randomized trials matching our inclusion criteria were published: one in 2006 [5], two in 2007 [6,7], four in 2008 [8][9][10][11], four in 2009 [12][13][14][15] and five in 2010 [16][17][18][19][20]. We added two publications of Nieminen, reporting long-term results of the randomized trial initially written by Hiltunen in 2007 [6,21,22].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In randomized studies, there was no significant difference between the two techniques (traditional surgery or using graft) when comparing "average blood loss" (596 patients in seven studies) [5,7,13,14,[18][19][20] or "important blood loss" (446 patients in four studies) [6,9,12,17]. A superior blood loss in the group with prosthetic reinforcement was found by Hiltunen and Altman [6,23].…”

Section: Bleedingmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Non-randomized studies showed, respectively, 1.94%, 1.6% and 1.55% of bladder, urethral or ureteral injuries, while in randomized studies, these complications were reported, respectively, in three studies for bladder injury (meaning four patients out of 160) [6,9,19], one study for urethral injury (one patient out of 29) [17] and one study for ureteral injury (one patient out of 31) [5]. No rectal injury was reported in randomized studies, versus 0.58% out of 5,877 patients in cohorts (47 NRT).…”

Section: Visceral Injurymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five randomized studies evaluated the post-surgical rate of SUI, but only Ek and Altman showed a higher frequency of de novo SUI after prosthetic reinforcement [16,23]. When de novo SUI is clearly defined, it was reported in 26 cases out of 415 patients in eight trials [6,9,11,[14][15][16]20].…”

Section: General Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a literature review

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair through the vaginal route has increased during this last decade. The objective is to improve anatomical results (sacropexy with mesh seeming better than traditional surgery) and keep still the advantage of vaginal route. Numbers of cohort series and randomized control trials have been recently published. These works increase our knowledge of advantages and risks of mesh. It has been shown that the use of mesh to treat cystocoele through vaginal route improves anatomical results when compared to traditional surgery. The rate of complications, especially de novo dyspareunia, remains equivalent between the two techniques.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bleedingmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Visceral Injurymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: General Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a literature review

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is faster and easier to perform, and less painful than sacrospinous suspension. 25 vii) In pectineal ligament suspension, the uterus is suspended to the pectineal ligament bilaterally with a merselene tape. This technique is a simple, safe and effective treatment for uterine prolapse in young women.…”

Section: Uterus Sparing Surgical Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Ijaiya

Raji

2012

UIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prolapse of the pelvic organs is a common condition encountered in gynecological practice that adversely affects the quality of life of affected women. It affects millions of women worldwide. The principles of treatment of pelvic organ prolapse include restoring anatomy and vaginal function, correcting associated urinary and or fecal incontinence, and preventing de novo prolapse and incontinence. There are various treatment options for pelvic organ prolapse. These vary from conservative treatments/mechanical interventions to surgery. The choice of treatment depends on severity of symptoms, patient's age, parity, and whether there is the need to conserve the uterus for reproductive function. In conclusion, thorough evaluation of symptoms and degree of prolapse is essential in order to provide the best possible treatment and ultimately improve quality of life.

show abstract

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Maher¹,

Baeßler

Glazener

et al. 2010

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

621

183

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abdominal sacral colpopexy was associated with a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse and dyspareunia than with vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time, longer time to return to activities of daily living and increased cost of the abdominal approach. The use of mesh or graft inlays at the time of anterior vaginal wall repair reduces the risk of recurrent anterior wall prolapse, on examination. Posterior vaginal wall repair may be better than transanal repair in the management of rectoceles in terms of recurrence of prolapse. The value of the addition of a continence procedure to a prolapse repair operation in women who are dry before operation remains to be assessed. Adequately powered randomised controlled clinical trials are urgently needed on a wide variety of issues and particularly need to include women's perceptions of prolapse symptoms.

show abstract

Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Abstract: Infracoccygeal sacropexy is equivalent to sacrospinous suspension, with a decreased rate of postoperative pain and cystocele recurrence.

Cited by 53 publications

References 19 publications

Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a literature review

Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a literature review

Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About