2014 Seventh International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iscid.2014.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared Image Denoising via L1/2 Sparse Representation over Learned Dictionary

Abstract: Infrared (IR) images often have low resolution and vague details, resulting in lower image quality and poor visual effect. This paper comes up with an Infrared image denoising method via L 1/2 sparse representation, while simultaneously training a over-complete dictionary on its content using the K-SVD algorithm. Experiment results have shown excellent denoising ability of the proposed denoising method, which can efficiently reduce Gaussian noise while exploiting much more image texture information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to noise reduction, mean filtering [30], median filtering [31] and adaptive filtering [32, 33] are commonly used, and a range of advanced algorithms upon them came out with different superiorities [34–36]. Besides, wavelet transform [37], over‐complete sparse representation [38, 39], convolutional neural network [40] have also been introduced and greatly improved the accuracy and speed of image de‐noising.…”
Section: Machine‐assisted Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to noise reduction, mean filtering [30], median filtering [31] and adaptive filtering [32, 33] are commonly used, and a range of advanced algorithms upon them came out with different superiorities [34–36]. Besides, wavelet transform [37], over‐complete sparse representation [38, 39], convolutional neural network [40] have also been introduced and greatly improved the accuracy and speed of image de‐noising.…”
Section: Machine‐assisted Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%