2019 IEEE 1st Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/lifetech.2019.8884023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared Laser Stimulation of Cochlear Nerve through a Tympanic Membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The repetition rate of the laser stimuli was 100 Hz. The laser was presented 100 times via an optical fiber (diameter, 100 μm; NA, 0.22) and inserted mediolaterally into the left outer ear canal using a micromanipulator (MM-3, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) as described in earlier reports (Tamai et al, 2019;Tamai et al, 2020). The tip of stimulation fiber was set at around 0.7 mm in front of the tympanic membrane to ensure that the cochlea was irradiated transtympanically from the outer ear (Fig.…”
Section: Laser Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The repetition rate of the laser stimuli was 100 Hz. The laser was presented 100 times via an optical fiber (diameter, 100 μm; NA, 0.22) and inserted mediolaterally into the left outer ear canal using a micromanipulator (MM-3, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) as described in earlier reports (Tamai et al, 2019;Tamai et al, 2020). The tip of stimulation fiber was set at around 0.7 mm in front of the tympanic membrane to ensure that the cochlea was irradiated transtympanically from the outer ear (Fig.…”
Section: Laser Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP) were separated according to their latency as described in earlier reports (Izzo et al, 2006;Tamai et al, 2019;Tamai et al, 2020;Teudt et al, 2011). The delays from stimulus onset to the first peak of the CM and CAP responses were measured.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the optic fiber was controlled with a micromanipulator (MM-3, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). The laser stimulation was performed as described in previous studies including ours [21,56]. The head of the animal was oriented so that the sagittal suture is aligned with the horizontal plane.…”
Section: Laser Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound pressure level of the sound that is generated by the optoacoustic effect reached 19 dB SPL when measured at maximum intensity (i.e., 12.8 mJ/cm 2 ) at 2 mm from the laser fiber tip. Our previous research assured that continuous laser irradiation with that maximum intensity for 1 h did not cause any thermal damage on the gerbil's cochlea and tympanic membrane [56]. The voltage commands for the laser stimuli were generated using a digital-to-analog converter (Octacapture, Roland, Shizuoka, Japan).…”
Section: Laser Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since humans have a thicker tympanic membrane than gerbils (30-90 µm;Lim, 1970), this could be associated with a greater risk of damage to the tympanic membrane. Although our previous study demonstrated that continuous transtympanic membrane laser irradiation at 12.8 mJ/cm 2 for 1 h did not result in observable damage to the tympanic membrane in gerbils (Tamai et al, 2019), safety evaluation using a human tympanic membrane must be performed prior to the practical application of infrared laser stimulation in auditory prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%