1984
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.198400032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared Multiphoton Absorption by Methanol

Abstract: The multiphoton absorption of CO2 laser 9 μm P(18), P(20) and P(34) lines by methanol has been studied for fluences from 10−3 to ∼ 20 J/cm2, pulse widths of 6 and 60 ns FWHM and methanol pressures from 0.067 to 13.3 kPa. The absorption depends on laser fluence, laser line and gas pressure but not on laser beam intensity. For each line studied the results can be expressed as a function of fluence and the product of pressure with pulse width. Absorption by a Q‐branch transition (9P(34) pumping) shows a faster re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. These results show a behaviour similar to the PAT (where AT is laser pulse width) dependence observed for constant @ for CDF, (3 l), CH30H (32), and cyclobutanone (33) and fits the empirical equation [2] [ l ] are negative), absorption of the laser light during transmission through the CDC13 significantly reduces + in the region of the gas that the microphone samples. This, as has been discussed in ref.…”
Section: Mpa Measurementssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. These results show a behaviour similar to the PAT (where AT is laser pulse width) dependence observed for constant @ for CDF, (3 l), CH30H (32), and cyclobutanone (33) and fits the empirical equation [2] [ l ] are negative), absorption of the laser light during transmission through the CDC13 significantly reduces + in the region of the gas that the microphone samples. This, as has been discussed in ref.…”
Section: Mpa Measurementssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This, as has been discussed in ref. 32, leads to a large uncertainty in the results, and consequently we do not report u values for the photoacoustic measurements. However, from the MPA results, (n)(+) for + = 10 J/cm2 has been estimated using several laser lines.…”
Section: Mpa Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%