1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19487.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared spectroscopy of phytochrome and model pigments

Abstract: Fourier-transform infrared difference spectra between the red-absorbing and far-red-absorbing forms of oat phytochrome have been measured in H 2 0 and 2H20. The difference spectra are compared with infrared spectra of model compounds, i.e. the (52,102,152)-and (52,102,15E)-isomers of 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-bilindion (Et8-bilindion), 2,3-dihydro-2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-bilindion (H2Et8-bilindion), and protonated H,Et8-bilindion in various solvents. The spectra of the model compounds show that only … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The disagreement existing in the literature about the protonation state of Pf, (Fodor et al, 1990;Siebert et al, 1990;Mizutaniet al, 1991;Hildebrandt et al, 1992) is thus solved: The UV-resonant 1591-cm-I mode (component IV), which is not sensitive to deuteration (Mizutani et al, 1991) and does involve a vCN coordinate (this work), most likely from ring C, constitutes a good indicator for an unprotonated ring C in both the Pf, and P, forms. The visible-or near-IR-resonant 1595-cm-I mode (component V), which is sensitive to deuteriation (Fodor et al, 1990;Hildebrandt et al, 1992) and involves a C N stretch at ring D and a methine CC stretch at C15 (this work), is an indicator of the anti conformation at CIS but cannot constitute an indicator of protonation at ring C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The disagreement existing in the literature about the protonation state of Pf, (Fodor et al, 1990;Siebert et al, 1990;Mizutaniet al, 1991;Hildebrandt et al, 1992) is thus solved: The UV-resonant 1591-cm-I mode (component IV), which is not sensitive to deuteration (Mizutani et al, 1991) and does involve a vCN coordinate (this work), most likely from ring C, constitutes a good indicator for an unprotonated ring C in both the Pf, and P, forms. The visible-or near-IR-resonant 1595-cm-I mode (component V), which is sensitive to deuteriation (Fodor et al, 1990;Hildebrandt et al, 1992) and involves a C N stretch at ring D and a methine CC stretch at C15 (this work), is an indicator of the anti conformation at CIS but cannot constitute an indicator of protonation at ring C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since the assignment of bands in vibrational spectra is still at an early stage, only a few aspects are discussed. The observed spectral homologies to the spectra of phyA (15,16) suggest that the chromophore structure of the parent states must be very similar in both pigments, whereas at low temperatures considerable spectral deviations are observed during the phototransformations which are probably due to the altered protein environment of the chromophore in Cph1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From recent investigations of Cph1 by optical and FT-Raman spectroscopy it is assumed that the chromophore of Cph1 is protonated in Pr since considerable similarities to phyA were observed (12). In addition, from investigations on tetrapyrrole model compounds it is known that the absorbance frequency of the C 19 ϭO stretching vibration of the outer ring coupled with the conjugatedelectron system is found around 1690 cm Ϫ1 which is shifted to ഠ1705 cm Ϫ1 upon protonation of the pigment (15,21). Taking together these arguments we suggest that the Z,E isomerization of the protonated chromophore takes place during the formation of the first intermediate of the Pr → Pfr pathway.…”
Section: Ft-ir Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can at least be concluded from these results that a proton transfer from the chromophore to the protein is not closely linked to rate-limiting processes of dark relaxation steps. The assumption of a protonated chromophore not only in the Pr form, but also in the Pfr form as deduced from FT-IR spectra (Siebert et al, 1990), would support such a view of lack of a proton transfer during the photoconversion. This interpretation has, however, been questioned (Tokutomi et al, 1990;Mizutani et al, 1991).…”
Section: Chromophore Isomerization and Proton Transfermentioning
confidence: 84%