“…Discrepancies in natural vs. experimental fire thermometry may also be perpetuated by variable environmental conditions, and the inter-and intraheterogeneity of fuels (Ishimaru et al, 2007a;Guedes et al, 2010). Furthermore, in the context of palaeowildfires, the nature of archaeological and geological records with regards to charcoal suggest considerable potential for alteration of wildfire evidence, through diagenetic processes such as humification and oxidation (Cohen-Ofri et al, 2006;Braadbaart et al, 2009;Ascough et al, 2008;Ascough et al, 2010;Ascough et al, 2011a;Ascough et al, 2018;Ascough et al, 2020;de Sousa et al, 2020;Smidt et al, 2020), and taphonomic bias (Scott and Damblon, 2010 and references therein). Such natural variability, particularly with regards to the influence of energy flux may bring into question the validity of historic assessments of palaeowildfire temperature.…”