2021
DOI: 10.1177/0309132521991220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure and non-human life: A wider ontology

Abstract: This article develops a wider ontology of infrastructure. It argues that infrastructures not only hasten the flow of materials but produce non-human mobilities and immobilities that radically alter the dynamics of life. Infrastructures become a medium of life as natural and infrastructural ecologies meld, reorienting notions of design, architecture, planning and governance. Non-human life itself can be cast as infrastructure, with biopolitical implications for anticipating and managing the future. An infrastru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In migration and mobility studies, an infrastructural perspective is used in Kleibert’s (2022) research on offshore higher education campuses to shift the prevailing focus from migrants, their families and communities towards studying how migration or mobility brokers (including campuses) operate as and within institutions and networks (see also Xiang and Lindquist, 2014). For Barua (2021) – writing about more-than-human geographies – an infrastructural perspective is an ontology that seeks to decentre anthropocentrism in favour of giving greater attention to the infrastructures populated by a ‘non-human habitus’ (Barua, 2021: 1469) of animals, but which can have a bearing on human life or abandonment.…”
Section: Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In migration and mobility studies, an infrastructural perspective is used in Kleibert’s (2022) research on offshore higher education campuses to shift the prevailing focus from migrants, their families and communities towards studying how migration or mobility brokers (including campuses) operate as and within institutions and networks (see also Xiang and Lindquist, 2014). For Barua (2021) – writing about more-than-human geographies – an infrastructural perspective is an ontology that seeks to decentre anthropocentrism in favour of giving greater attention to the infrastructures populated by a ‘non-human habitus’ (Barua, 2021: 1469) of animals, but which can have a bearing on human life or abandonment.…”
Section: Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the emergence of beyond‐human designs, there remain questions of who can flourish under these new configurations of urban co‐habitation, and who cannot. As Barua ( 2021 ) contends, infrastructure not only shapes animals’ mobilities and atmospheres, but also how animals themselves can become urban infrastructure.…”
Section: Urban Planning Design and Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are stresses that reemerge continually as central problems of modern, racial, colonial, globalized capitalism. Maan Barua (Barua, 2021) and Sandra Jasper (Jasper, 2020) call out the importance of abandoned, disused infrastructures and their relationships to human and nonhuman existences and exigencies. Nelson and Bigger question the casting of nature and ecosystems as infrastructures as an ontological trick of and problem in development conservation and green capitalism (Nelson & Bigger, 2021).…”
Section: Some Ironies Of Infrastructure Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%