2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2016-0468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure crisis — a proposed national infrastructure policy for Canada

Abstract: The paper proposes a National Infrastructure Policy (NIP) for Canada, including establishing a national infrastructure bank to overcome the current dire financial and other difficulties in renewal of Canada's extensively deteriorated infrastructure, and for construction of new infrastructure to fulfill the society's new needs. After examining the deteriorated state of infrastructure in Canada, the U.S.A. and the world, the current infrastructure deficits and the consequences of inaction, along with the views o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of getting the most benefits for the least amount of investment is not a novel idea within the domain of the road network projects. Researchers (Jingning, 2015;Mirza and Ali, 2017) have advocated the intermingling of LCCA-effective design and OM&R practices with those of value engineering to improve the decision-making paradigm. Further argument by Alqahtani and Whyte (2016) advocates for the calculation of indirect socio-economical, environmental and road-user indirect costs, such as: accessibility and comfort; accident and safety; time-delays; and, vehicle operational costs due to congestions, detours and work zone conditions.…”
Section: Stakeholder Expenses: Costs To Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of getting the most benefits for the least amount of investment is not a novel idea within the domain of the road network projects. Researchers (Jingning, 2015;Mirza and Ali, 2017) have advocated the intermingling of LCCA-effective design and OM&R practices with those of value engineering to improve the decision-making paradigm. Further argument by Alqahtani and Whyte (2016) advocates for the calculation of indirect socio-economical, environmental and road-user indirect costs, such as: accessibility and comfort; accident and safety; time-delays; and, vehicle operational costs due to congestions, detours and work zone conditions.…”
Section: Stakeholder Expenses: Costs To Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2020, the total population in the Ottawa‐Gatineau and Montréal metropolitan areas is over 5.5 million (Statistics Canada, 2020b). Despite the economic and political importance of these areas, infrastructure in these cities is mostly old and is likely to be ill‐prepared for possible future strong ground shaking during an earthquake (Goda, 2019; Kovacs, 2010; Mirza & Ali, 2017). Mapping of active faults is therefore critical to estimating the seismic hazard in an area and, consequently, to formulating a reliable building code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, infrastructures in this area, like in most cities in eastern Canada are unlikely This is a non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to EarthArXiv. to be earthquake proof (Goda, 2019;Kovacs, 2010;Mirza & Ali, 2017). Improved knowledge of the level of seismic hazard in this area, from the earthquake magnitude estimates proposed in this study, could allow the following: 1) a better assessment of the suitability of the area for future urban development (e.g., Bathrellos et al, 2017); 2) proper implementation of seismic protection measures for timber structures (Ugalde et al, 2019) and historical structures and monuments (Syrmakezis, 2006); and 3) planning for mitigation of induced seismicity, potentially from industrial activity as the area develops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%