1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingestive behavior and growth when chicks from lines differing in feed consumption are reared separately or intermingled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality of LL chicks occurred during the first week and was caused by starve-out, a situation common in this line which has an incidence of anorexia (Zelenka et al, 1988;Noble et al, 1993). Mortality was similar for diet A (8%) and diet E (10%).…”
Section: Mortality and Body Weightsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mortality of LL chicks occurred during the first week and was caused by starve-out, a situation common in this line which has an incidence of anorexia (Zelenka et al, 1988;Noble et al, 1993). Mortality was similar for diet A (8%) and diet E (10%).…”
Section: Mortality and Body Weightsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Body weights of R chicks were also obtained to the nearest 0.1 g after removal of the yolk sac. The procedure for removal of the yolk sac has been described previously (Turro et al, 1994 Barbato et al, 1980;BoaAmponsen et al, 1991;O'Sullivan et al, 1992b;Noble et al, 1993). Generally, HW chickens were hyperphagic while LW ones were hypophagic with some individuals being anorexic (Burkhart et al, 1983;Zelenka et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lines of chickens selected for high or low juvenile body weight (Dunnington and Siegel, 1985) differed in feeding behavior and food intake (Barbato et al, 1980;Dunnington et al, 1987;Boa Amponsen et al, 1991; O'Sullivan et al, 1992a;Noble et al, 1993 (Dunnington and Siegel, 1985). Chicks from each line were removed from the hatcher, wingbanded, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g. Seventy-two chicks were then randomly assigned for either removal of the yolk sac (R) or to remain intact (I).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%