2012
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i3.14328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingestive behavior of Guzerat and Sindhi heifers under the effects of feed restriction

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of feed restriction on the ingestive behavior of Guzerat and Sindhi heifers. A total of 36 heifers were used, 18 from each breed, randomly distributed in a completely randomized design, in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme. The treatments used were 20 and 40% restriction compared to intake by animals from the third group, which were fed ad libitum (without restriction). For the behavioral analysis, the scan sampling method was used by logging and recording times in five-minute in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the lower feed supply was compensated by a shorter feeding time of animals subjected to restraint, thereby DMI and feeding time varied proportionately. These results are consistent with those described by Ribeiro et al (2006) and Cândido et al (2012), who observed no effect of feed restriction on the IEDM and IENDF in goats and cattle, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the lower feed supply was compensated by a shorter feeding time of animals subjected to restraint, thereby DMI and feeding time varied proportionately. These results are consistent with those described by Ribeiro et al (2006) and Cândido et al (2012), who observed no effect of feed restriction on the IEDM and IENDF in goats and cattle, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to Dulphy et al (1980), the RENDF is increased when there is a larger fibre intake by ruminants. A similar result was described by Cândido et al (2012), who observed higher values of REDM and RENDF in cattle fed ad libitum compared with those submitted to feed restriction. Galvani et al (2010) also observed greater RTDM in lambs subjected to feed restriction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Number of meals was unaffected by feeding restriction, which agrees with PF results and indicated that Restriction animals were able to manage reduced feeding allowance by distributing their consumption during the day. On the contrary, CÂNDIDO et al (2012) subjected heifers to a 40% feeding restriction and observed a reduction from 4.12 to 2.34 meals per day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%