Ingredients and change processes in occupational therapy for children: a grounded theory study

Armitage, Samantha; Kolehmainen, Niina

doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1201141

Cited by 10 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…parental self-efficacy, are suggested and potential intervention outcomes have been grouped into four categories: parenting and parent behaviour; parent health; child behaviour and peer and social support. The wider evidence base for interventions to support children with neurodisability more broadly supports the potential for factors such as parental self-efficacy to be a plausible mechanism for change (Armitage, Swallow, & Kolehmainen, 2016) within group-based parent training interventions. By drawing on this wider research field, some of the exploratory findings from our review such as intervention ingredients (e.g.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group-Based Parent Training Interventions for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a Literature Review

O'Donovan

Armitage

Featherstone

et al. 2018

Rev J Autism Dev Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group-Based Parent Training Interventions for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a Literature Review

O'Donovan

Armitage

Featherstone

et al. 2018

Rev J Autism Dev Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Codes that represented a similar concept were subsequently assembled into conceptual categories [ 22 ] with the assistance of the memos. Coding was performed iteratively within and between interview transcripts, using the technique of constant comparative analysis [ 23 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners

Robin

Perkins

Watkins

et al. 2017

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the United Kingdom, following the emergence of Seoul hantavirus in pet rat owners in 2012, public health authorities tried to communicate the risk of this zoonotic disease, but had limited success. To explore this lack of engagement with health advice, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with pet rat owners and analysed them using a grounded theory approach. The findings from these interviews suggest that rat owners construct their pets as different from wild rats, and by elevating the rat to the status of a pet, the powerful associations that rats have with dirt and disease are removed. Removing the rat from the contaminated outside world moves their pet rat from being ‘out of place’ to ‘in place’. A concept of ‘bounded purity’ keeps the rat protected within the home, allowing owners to interact with their pet, safe in the knowledge that it is clean and disease-free. Additionally, owners constructed a ‘hierarchy of purity’ for their pets, and it is on this structure of disease and risk that owners base their behaviour, not conventional biomedical models of disease.

show abstract

“…The characteristics of the fifteen included papers are presented in Table 1. Six of the studies were conducted in the United Kingdom [31,45,[49][50][51][52], five in Canada [33,34,44,53,54], one in Austria/ Italy [55], one in Brazil [56], one in Belgium [57], and one in New Zealand [58]. In total, data from one hundred and nine participants were included in the qualitative synthesis.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, data from one hundred and nine participants were included in the qualitative synthesis. Nine papers had participants with a mean age ranging from 6.9 years to 11 years [33,34,45,49,[54][55][56][57][58]. Five papers had participants with a mean age range of 13 years to 14.9 years [31,[50][51][52][53] and one study included young adults aged 19-25 years who reflected upon their experiences as an adolescent [44].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ten studies presented the philosophical perspective on which the study was based and a methodological approach which was congruent with the perspective [31,34,44,51,52,[54][55][56][57][58]. However, the philosophical or theoretical perspective was not clearly represented in the remaining five papers [33,45,49,50,53]. The majority of studies described an appropriate qualitative methodology for addressing the research question or objectives.…”

Section: Quality Appraisalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Children and young people’s experiences of living with developmental coordination disorder/dyspraxia: A systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative research

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To date services for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have not been informed by the perspective of children with DCD. This study aimed to synthesise the findings of discrete qualitative studies reporting the lived experiences views and preferences of children and young with DCD using a meta-ethnographic approach to develop new conceptual understandings. Methods A systematic search of ten databases; Academic Search Complete, AMED, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsychArticles, PsychInfo, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, was conducted between March and April 2019, and updated in early June 2020. Meta-ethnography, following the method described by Noblit and Hare was used to synthesise included studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist was used to appraise all included papers. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019129178. Results Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-ethnographic synthesis produced three themes; a) ‘It’s harder than it should be’: Navigating daily activities b) Fitting in, and c) ‘So what? I drop things’: Strategies and supports to mitigate challenges. Children with DCD describe a mismatch between their abilities and performance norms for daily activities that led to a cascade of negative consequences including negative self-appraisal, bullying and exclusion. In the face of these difficulties children described creative and successful strategies they enacted and supports they accessed including; assistance from others (parents, friends and teachers), focusing on their strengths and talents, accepting and embracing their difference, adopting a “just do it” attitude, setting personal goals, self-exclusion from some social activities, using humour or sarcasm, viewing performance expectations as a social construct, and enjoying friendships as a forum for fun, acceptance and protection against exclusion. Conclusion Service provision for children and young people with DCD should address the social and attitudinal environments, focus on friendship and social inclusion and address stigma-based bullying particularly within the school environment. Furthermore, practitioners should identify and foster children’s own strategies for navigating daily life activities with DCD. The identified themes resonate with contemporary disability theory and the International Classification of Functioning. The social and attitudinal environmental context of children and young people with DCD profoundly influences their experiences. Future intervention development and service provision for children and young people with DCD should consider opportunities to address social and attitudinal environmental factors.

show abstract

Ingredients and change processes in occupational therapy for children: a grounded theory study

Cited by 10 publications

References 15 publications

Group-Based Parent Training Interventions for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a Literature Review

Group-Based Parent Training Interventions for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a Literature Review

Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners

Children and young people’s experiences of living with developmental coordination disorder/dyspraxia: A systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About