2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0213-9111(08)75354-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingreso hospitalario de los recién nacidos según el origen étnico y el país de procedencia de los progenitores en una área urbana de Barcelona

Abstract: Differences in non-native and gypsy newborns compared with native newborns are not due to imported or genetic diseases but are probably due to differences in the social and cultural environment during pregnancy. Preventive measures should be promoted and reinforced and access to and the quality of primary care should be improved in these mothers and their infants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All groups show a lower risk of LBW with the exceptions of EU-15 and USA & Canada, with no conclusive differences, and sub-Saharan Africa, who show a significantly higher risk. These results support previous evidence in Spain for most groups29 30 and a disadvantage for babies of sub-Saharan descent 30 31. The advantage is also observed among LBW at term babies (proxy of babies with intrauterine growth restriction).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…All groups show a lower risk of LBW with the exceptions of EU-15 and USA & Canada, with no conclusive differences, and sub-Saharan Africa, who show a significantly higher risk. These results support previous evidence in Spain for most groups29 30 and a disadvantage for babies of sub-Saharan descent 30 31. The advantage is also observed among LBW at term babies (proxy of babies with intrauterine growth restriction).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Worse birth outcomes (shorter gestation length, lower birth weight) among Roma in comparison with non-Roma mothers were confirmed in Czech Republic (Bobak et al 2005; Rambouskova et al 2009), Slovakia (Rimarova et al 2004), Hungary (Joubert 1991) and Spain (Sola et al 2008). Higher morbidity (incidence of bronchitis, pneumonia, viral diseases, otitis media, influenza and intestinal infections) of Roma children 0–2 years of age as compared to non-Roma children was confirmed by Dostal et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Worse birth outcomes as well as higher morbidity in early childhood used to be attributed to maternal education (Bobak et al 2005; Dostal et al 2010), maternal smoking (Dostal et al 2010; Rambouskova et al 2009; Rimarova et al 2004), a lack of prenatal care (Sola et al 2008) and poor living conditions (Monasta et al 2008). Incidence of health problems among Roma children aged 0–5 years living in Roma settlements was associated with years spent living at the camp, overcrowding, housing conditions, use of wood-burning stoves, the presence of rats and issues related to the quality of sanitation and drains (Monasta et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are related to what has been called the “healthy immigrant effect” or the “epidemiologic paradox”, which states that immigrant women are likely to have better health outcomes, including reproductive outcomes, because they are younger and have healthier lifestyles. This effect was first described in Latino immigrants (mainly Mexican women) in the United States [ 1 ] and has also been described in African immigrant women in Europe [ 2 4 ] and in Spain [ 5 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%