1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01065320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhalation exposure to 1,3-dichloropropene in the Dutch flower-bulb culture. Part I. Environmental monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhalatory exposure in this study was lower than in the flower bulb study in which the 8 hour TWA exposure ranged from 1.9–18.9 mg/m3 but only 15% of the working days exceeded 8 hours 3. Also the peak exposures (15 mg/m 3 ) were considerably lower than those in the flower bulb study in which peak concentrations up to 110 mg/m 3 were measured 3.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The inhalatory exposure in this study was lower than in the flower bulb study in which the 8 hour TWA exposure ranged from 1.9–18.9 mg/m3 but only 15% of the working days exceeded 8 hours 3. Also the peak exposures (15 mg/m 3 ) were considerably lower than those in the flower bulb study in which peak concentrations up to 110 mg/m 3 were measured 3.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Also the peak exposures (15 mg/m 3 ) were considerably lower than those in the flower bulb study in which peak concentrations up to 110 mg/m 3 were measured 3. Although the field situation and fumigation procedures in the potato growing region and the flower bulb culture are not completely comparable, the results of this study suggest that the new statutory directions of use are effective in reducing the exposure of the workers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations