2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009471.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects on growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
2
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
58
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic adverse effects such as growth suppression and local effects including oropharyngeal candidiasis are well recognised in association with ICS [4][5][6][7]. With recent pragmatic studies showing greater adherence to, and effectiveness of, LTRA compared to ICS [8][9][10], the prospect of increased adherence resulting in better asthma control has renewed interest in the use of LTRA as monotherapy or adjunct therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic adverse effects such as growth suppression and local effects including oropharyngeal candidiasis are well recognised in association with ICS [4][5][6][7]. With recent pragmatic studies showing greater adherence to, and effectiveness of, LTRA compared to ICS [8][9][10], the prospect of increased adherence resulting in better asthma control has renewed interest in the use of LTRA as monotherapy or adjunct therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ICS have an onset of action within one to four weeks (28), and most trials demonstrated ICS efficacy within three to six months (13,27), a minimum therapeutic trial of three months is recommended. In this age group, budesonide and fluticasone have been studied the most extensively and have been found to be clinically effective (19,27), with fluticasone showing less effect on growth than beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide at equivalent doses (29). Because delivery by metered-dose inhaler is preferred, budesonide is not recommended because it is only available for use by nebulization in Canada in children <6 years of age.…”
Section: Diagnosis In a Child Presenting Without Signs Of Airflow Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expansion of the indication for low dose inhaled corticosteroids is very surprising since the evidence is clearly lacking and does not consider the possible side-effects of inhaled corticosteroids, which are likely to outweigh the benefits, in particular for children [33]. Moreover, compliance of patients is likely to be even worse than for other steps of GINA.…”
Section: @Erspublicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%