2018
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

Abstract: The purpose of the paper is to use fundamental theoretical and experimental elements of electrodynamics for deriving properties of radiation fields and of bound fields. A wide variety of examples prove that radiation fields and bound fields do not represent the same physical object. This conclusion is new. Some examples belong to the classical domain and others belong to the quantum domain. Consequences of this outcome affect several physical issues. In particular, these fields should be treated separately. Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has to be taken into account that Dirac's monopole is driven by the wish to prove the quantized nature of electric charge. As pointed out by Comay [5,12,13,14] . However, whereas full symmetry would require a vector potential A such that…”
Section: Comay's Monopole Versus Dirac's Monopolementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it has to be taken into account that Dirac's monopole is driven by the wish to prove the quantized nature of electric charge. As pointed out by Comay [5,12,13,14] . However, whereas full symmetry would require a vector potential A such that…”
Section: Comay's Monopole Versus Dirac's Monopolementioning
confidence: 94%
“…ield parameter  . A comparison of this structural model with the Standard Model, has revealed the relationship, (11) rather than as an individual quark relationship is seen as the nuclear equivalent of interpreted as the boson subject to the Proca-type wave , (12) type pointlike source that can be expressed as, (13) in which ) (t H and ) (r  , respectively, are Heaviside's step function and Dirac's delta function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has to be taken into account that Dirac's monopole is driven by the wish to prove the quantized nature of electric charge. As pointed out by Comay [9,16,17,18] in his Regular Charge Monopole Theory (RCMT), this wish has spoiled the symmetry of Dirac's monopole theory. Dirac's theory as well as Comay's theory is fully symmetrical under the substitutions…”
Section: Comay's Monopole Versus Dirac's Monopolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, radiation fields are associated with a photon, which is a well-known quantum particle. These conflicting spin and parity values prove that whether or not bound fields represent a genuine quantum particle, radiation fields and bound fields are inherently different physical entities (see also [13]).…”
Section: Radiation Fields and Bound Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%