2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21771-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inherently confinable split-drive systems in Drosophila

Abstract: CRISPR-based gene-drive systems, which copy themselves via gene conversion mediated by the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway, have the potential to revolutionize vector control. However, mutant alleles generated by the competing non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, resistant to Cas9 cleavage, can interrupt the spread of gene-drive elements. We hypothesized that drives targeting genes essential for viability or reproduction also carrying recoded sequences that restore endogenous gene functionality sh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
106
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to suppression drives, the impediment to drive success imposed by functional alleles resistant to Cas9 cleavage is much less of a concern for modification drives, which are designed not to impose any significant fitness costs 70 . Consistent with the expectation that rare functional drive-resistant alleles should have little, if any, advantage over a fitness-neutral drive allele, such variants have not been observed to expand in small population cages 54 , 57 , 85 , in contrast to the strong positive selection imposed on this class of alleles by suppression drives 47 , 86 . These comparative considerations notwithstanding, it still makes good engineering sense for modification drives to achieve maximal introduction into a target population.…”
Section: Modification Drivessupporting
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to suppression drives, the impediment to drive success imposed by functional alleles resistant to Cas9 cleavage is much less of a concern for modification drives, which are designed not to impose any significant fitness costs 70 . Consistent with the expectation that rare functional drive-resistant alleles should have little, if any, advantage over a fitness-neutral drive allele, such variants have not been observed to expand in small population cages 54 , 57 , 85 , in contrast to the strong positive selection imposed on this class of alleles by suppression drives 47 , 86 . These comparative considerations notwithstanding, it still makes good engineering sense for modification drives to achieve maximal introduction into a target population.…”
Section: Modification Drivessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A broadly transferable system for eliminating non-functional drive-resistant alleles, present either as sequence variants in a population 78 , 92 95 or arising during the gene-drive process 45 47 , 49 , 60 , 76 , 77 , is to insert the drive into an essential gene and endow it with a recoded cDNA-restoring gene function 53 57 , 61 . Such recoded-drive elements can survive when homozygous.…”
Section: Modification Drivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations