When
a material is identified as potentially capable of explosive
propagation by the Yoshida correlation, process safety scientists
have few options for semiquantitatively assessing the hazards associated
with the use of that material. Oxygen balance calculations, the Rule
of 6, and the United Nations (U.N.) explosive functional group list
are commonly employed qualitative/semiquantitative methods to assess
explosivity without requiring additional experimental data. In contrast,
a full United Nations Transportation of Dangerous Goods testing regimen
requires, at a minimum, 2 kg of material for Test Series 1 alone,
an excessive amount that is rarely available in early pharmaceutical
development. A new assessment, called the O.R.E.O.S. method, has been
developed that combines the three traditional methods for screening
of explosive properties (Oxygen balance calculations,
the Rule of 6, and the Explosive
functional group list) with the Onset of decomposition
determined by differential scanning calorimetry and the proposed Scale. This new assessment has been applied to known energetic
materials that are flagged as potentially capable of explosive propagation
by the Yoshida correlation and has been shown to be effective at classifying
materials in a scale-dependent manner. The tool is customizable to
fit any organization’s internal guidance on handling energetic
materials. This assessment should find wide utility in both pharmaceutical
development groups and contract research organizations as a means
to classify compounds that may require further testing before scale-up
or to steer project teams to discover safer alternatives. A brief
description of the challenges associated with transporting materials
for U.N. Series Testing is also presented with the aim of demystifying
the process for obtaining such valuable data.