1970
DOI: 10.1071/bi9700377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance of Ddt Resistance in a Laboratory Colony of the Housefly, Musca Domestica

Abstract: SummaryStrains of the housefly MUBOO domeatica L., derived by selection from the Canberra laboratory colony established in 1939, were examined genetically and cytologically to determine their composition, in respect to resistance to DDT, and the modes of sex determination and inheritance of this resistance.DDT resistance was found to be determined by an incompletely dominant allele of a gene in chromosome II that confers the ability to metabolize DDT to DDE. In flies of the normal karyotype, 2n = 12: XX female… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in a number of resistant populations autosomal M males have been found (Tsukamoto, 1983) and one laboratory experiment showed replacement of standard XY males by autosomal M males after several generations of selection for DDT resistance (Kerr, 1970). However, even though linkage with insecticide resistance genes could facilitate spread of autosomal M factors, it is not clear how it could contribute to the clinal distribution of SD factors in the housefly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in a number of resistant populations autosomal M males have been found (Tsukamoto, 1983) and one laboratory experiment showed replacement of standard XY males by autosomal M males after several generations of selection for DDT resistance (Kerr, 1970). However, even though linkage with insecticide resistance genes could facilitate spread of autosomal M factors, it is not clear how it could contribute to the clinal distribution of SD factors in the housefly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been proposed that autosomal M factors have spread due to their linkage with insecticide resistance genes (Kerr, 1970;Franco et al, 1982), since the isolation of autosomal M factors coincided with the appearance of insecticide resistance in natural populations of the housefly (Tomita & Wada, 1989b). Also, in a number of resistant populations autosomal M males have been found (Tsukamoto, 1983) and one laboratory experiment showed replacement of standard XY males by autosomal M males after several generations of selection for DDT resistance (Kerr, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, karyological analyses of males have failed to detect any translocated Y material in many AM strains (Hiroyoshi 1964;Wagoner 1969;Kerr 1970;Tsukamoto, Shono and Horio 1980). Hiroyoshi (1964) thus argued that the translocated Y material is too small to be visualized by the conventional cytological technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1958, cases of sex-limited inheritance, interpreted a posteriori as due to autosomal sex-determinants, have been described in several strains of houseflies of non-European origin (Sullivan, 1958;Milani & Franco, 1959a;Kerr, 1960Kerr, ,1961 M II, JUT III, M V, F, Australian laboratory strain (Wagoner, 1969); Mil, Australian DDT-resistant laboratory strains (Kerr, 1970); Mill, North American field populations (McDonald et al 1975); M III, F, Japanese field populations Fukumori, 1977, 1978); FIV, compound laboratory strain (North American-Australian), (McDonald et al 1978); Ml, Mil, Mill, F, Fijian field population (Hiroyoshi & Inoue, 1979); M I, MII, M III, M V, Japanese field populations (Tsukamoto, Shono & Horio, 1980). In Europe only two autosomal sex-determinants have been reported: M III, Czeck DDT-resistant laboratory strains (Rupes & Pinterova, 1975); F (probably polygenic), North Italian field population (Rubini, van Heemert & Franco, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%