Inheritance of Grape Seedlessness in Seeded and Seedless Hybrid Combinations of Grape Cultivars with Complex Genealogy

Roytchev, V.

doi:10.5344/ajev.1998.49.3.302

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Results reported in literature show a variable proportion of seedless offspring, depending on the parents. In crosses between seeded x seedless parents, segregation data showed a predominant 3:1 (seeded to seedless) ratio (Pospíšilová and Páleník 1988, Roytchev 1998, Spiegel-Roy et al 1990), but the most accepted hypothesis to explain the inheritance of seedlessness in grape was proposed by Bouquet and Danglot (1996). Based on crosses between partially seedless selections, they suggested the existence of a complex system in which the expression of three independently inherited recessive genes is controlled by a dominant regulator gene.…”

Section: Phenotypic Evaluation and Bsamentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular analysis of the seedlessness character in grape using RAPD markers

Lima¹,

Crippa²,

Garrido³

et al. 2006

CBAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Phenotypic Evaluation and Bsamentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular analysis of the seedlessness character in grape using RAPD markers

Lima¹,

Crippa²,

Garrido³

et al. 2006

CBAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, Mejıá et al (2007) found several QTLs in linkage groups (LG) 4, 8, 15, 16 and 18, being the most stable the QTLs of LG 18 (Doligez et al, 2002), which by in turn showed a high LOD score with the SEED DEVELOPMENT INHIBITOR locus (SDI; Lahogue et al, 1998) (Cabezas et al, 2006;Mejıá et al, 2007;Mejıá et al, 2011;Doligez et al, 2013), explaining more than 70% of the phenotypic variation of seeds (Mejıá et al, 2007). However, the absence of seeds had previously been suggested by Roytchev (1998) as a recessive trait that can also be controlled by dominant genes repressing seed formation, while Bouquet and Danglot (1996) ensured the action of three independent recessive genes regulated by a dominant inhibitory gene. Additionally, Notsuka et al (2001) propossed that the inheritance of this trait happens through a complex system of four dominant genes that code for the inhibition of seed formation, which in turn is controlled by a dominant regulatory gene, with the seeded fruit having the homozygous recessive genotype.…”

Section: Seedlesnessmentioning

confidence: 87%

Genetic changes in the genus Vitis and the domestication of vine

Guzmán-Ardiles

Pegoraro²,

Maia³

et al. 2023

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The genus Vitis belongs to the Vitaceae family and is divided into two subgenera: Muscadinia and Vitis, the main difference between these subgenera being the number of chromosomes. There are many hypotheses about the origin of the genus, which have been formed with archaeological studies and lately with molecular analyses. Even though there is no consensus on the place of origin, these studies have shown that grapes have been used by man since ancient times, starting later on its domestication. Most studies point to the Near East and Greece as the beginning of domestication, current research suggests it took place in parallel in different sites, but in all cases Vitis vinifera (L.) subsp. sylvestris [Vitis vinifera (L.) subsp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hagi] seems to be the species chosen by our ancestors to give rise to the now known Vitis vinifera (L.) subsp. vinifera [=sativa (Hegi)= caucasica (Vavilov)]. Its evolution and expansion into other territories followed the formation of new empires and their expansion, and this is where the historical importance of this crop lies. In this process, plants with hermaphrodite flowers were preferentially selected, with firmer, sweeter, larger fruits of different colors, thus favoring the selection of genes associated with these traits, also resulting in a change in seed morphology. Currently, genetic improvement programs have made use of wild species for the introgression of disease resistance genes and tolerance to diverse soil and climate environments. In addition, the mapping of genes of interest, both linked to agronomic and fruit quality traits, has allowed the use of molecular markers for assisted selection. Information on the domestication process and genetic resources help to understand the gene pool available for the development of cultivars that respond to producer and consumer requirements.

show abstract

Genetic mapping of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) applied to the detection of QTLs for seedlessness and berry weight

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parental and consensus genetic maps of Vitis vinifera L. (2n = 38) were constructed using a F(1) progeny of 139 individuals from a cross between two partially seedless genotypes. The consensus map contained 301 markers [250 amplification fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), 44 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), three isozymes, two random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), one sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR), and one phenotypic marker, berry color] mapped onto 20 linkage groups, and covered 1,002 cM. The maternal map consisted of 157 markers covering 767 cM (22 groups). The paternal map consisted of 144 markers covering 816 cM (23 groups). Differences in recombination rates between these maps and another unpublished map are discussed. The major gene for berry color was mapped on both the paternal and consensus maps. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for several quantitative subtraits of seedlessness in 3 successive years were searched for, based on parental maps: berry weight, seed number, seed total fresh and dry weights, seed percent dry matter, and seed mean fresh and dry weights. QTLs with large effects (R(2) up to 51%) were detected for all traits and years at the same location on one linkage group, with some evidence for the existence of a second linked major QTL for some of them. For these major QTLs, differences in relative parental effects were observed between traits. Three QTLs with small effects (R(2) from 6% to 11%) were also found on three other linkage groups, for berry weight and seed number in a single year, and for seed dry matter in 2 different years.

show abstract

Inheritance of Grape Seedlessness in Seeded and Seedless Hybrid Combinations of Grape Cultivars with Complex Genealogy

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Molecular analysis of the seedlessness character in grape using RAPD markers

Molecular analysis of the seedlessness character in grape using RAPD markers

Genetic changes in the genus Vitis and the domestication of vine

Genetic mapping of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) applied to the detection of QTLs for seedlessness and berry weight

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About