1980
DOI: 10.2527/jas1980.5061057x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance of Teat Number and its Relationship to Maternal Traits in Swine

Abstract: The relationship of teat number to seven measures of female reproduction was evaluated in the University of Nebraska Gene Pool population. Teat number was recorded for 7,513 pigs, ovulation rate for 2,794 gilts and litter size and weight at birth and weaning (42 days) for 789 gilts. Paternal half-sib and full-sib analyses were used to estimate heritabilities for each trait and to estimate the genetic and phenotypic correlations of teat number with the measures of reproduction. The direct response to selection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removing dominance effects from the mixed model resulted only in a 0.5% reduction in the observed accuracy of predicting phenotypic values, although the reductions in the expected accuracy of predicting phenotypic values (7.6%) and in the expected accuracy of predicting genetic values (3.9%) were considerably larger for unknown reasons (Table 2). Previously, a maternal effect on teat number was reported [24] but has not been studied by GWAS or genomic prediction. Data error is a source of phenotypic variation, but teat number is easy to measure and any data errors that might have occurred would only be minor, given that our GWAS results on chromosome 7 agreed with those of other studies [2, 3] and that our genomic heritability estimates are consistent with those based on pedigree data [3, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing dominance effects from the mixed model resulted only in a 0.5% reduction in the observed accuracy of predicting phenotypic values, although the reductions in the expected accuracy of predicting phenotypic values (7.6%) and in the expected accuracy of predicting genetic values (3.9%) were considerably larger for unknown reasons (Table 2). Previously, a maternal effect on teat number was reported [24] but has not been studied by GWAS or genomic prediction. Data error is a source of phenotypic variation, but teat number is easy to measure and any data errors that might have occurred would only be minor, given that our GWAS results on chromosome 7 agreed with those of other studies [2, 3] and that our genomic heritability estimates are consistent with those based on pedigree data [3, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of teats in pigs is a variable and heritable trait. Number of teats differs between breeds, for example [46], and is moderately heritable [710]. Numerous genome scans have been conducted for number of teats in pigs (QTLdb; http://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/SS/index), yet to date, few causative genes (or variants) have been discovered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported by the tribes that the sow in the last stage of gestation goes into the forest for farrowing. The number of teats was an important trait for the mothering ability of sows (Pumfrey et al, 1980) and, in particular, teat number played a significant role when there are more piglets than number of teats (Hirooka et al, 2001). After a month, the sow, along with her 8-10 piglets ( Figure 10), comes to the tribal shelter and, therefore, litter size at birth and mortality were not known.…”
Section: Performance and Breed Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%