2013
DOI: 10.2118/151575-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibited Gas Stimulation To Mitigate Condensate Banking and Maximize Recovery in Cupiagua Field

Abstract: Condensate banking has been identified as one of the most potentially damaging mechanisms affecting well productivity in Cupiagua Field. This gas-condensate giant field has reached an average recovery factor of 42%, with recovery values of approximately 60% in some layers of field. The mitigation of condensate banking phenomena, among the other important damaging mechanisms currently interacting along the entire productivity zones, has been one of the most relevant stimulation practices in the development stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, recently, a novel technique for well stimulation and fluid injection known as gas stimulation (GaStim) was proposed by Franco et al [28] and Restrepo et al [29]. The method consists of the dispersion of a liquid treatment on the gas stream, achieving high injection rates and liquid droplets with a smaller size, as well as increasing the invasion radius of the liquid around the injector well [29].…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, recently, a novel technique for well stimulation and fluid injection known as gas stimulation (GaStim) was proposed by Franco et al [28] and Restrepo et al [29]. The method consists of the dispersion of a liquid treatment on the gas stream, achieving high injection rates and liquid droplets with a smaller size, as well as increasing the invasion radius of the liquid around the injector well [29].…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N 2 flow was fixed at 100 mL•min −1 and H 2 O (g) was introduced using a gas saturator filled with distilled water and controlled by a thermostatic bath with a flow rate of 6.30 mL•min −1 [38]. Finally, the amount of adsorbed asphaltenes and/or resins was set at 0.2 ± 0.02 mg•m −2 for all samples [28]. The samples were subjected to non-isothermal and isothermal procedures.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample mass in the analyzer was kept low to avoid diffusions limitations (~5 mg) [115]. Also, the adsorbed amount of heavy species was kept at 1.5 mg/m 2 .…”
Section: Catalytic Steam Gasification Of Asphaltenes and Resinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The airflow rate was a constant 100 cm 3 /min throughout the experiment at a rate of 10 K/min. The sample mass was the same used for catalytic steam gasification of adsorbed species to avoid diffusions limitations (~5 mg) [115].…”
Section: Catalytic Steam Gasification Of Asphaltenes and Resinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid treatments have been used to stimulate wells drilled in both gas and oil reservoirs (Fredd and Fogler 1998). For carbonate reservoirs, acids can be used to dissolve part of the rock and create fractures or wormholes Schechter and Gidley 1969).…”
Section: Acidizingmentioning
confidence: 99%