“…In the former period, between 1964 and 1980, most au thors working in this field described the fol lowing situation: in the normal state, a rela tively low percentage of hepatocytes (be tween 1 and 36% according to the protein) were actively engaged in synthesis, and plasma protein-synthesizing hepatocytes were randomly distributed in the hepatic lobule with sometimes a preferential locali zation around the portal triads or the centrilobular vein. For example, this was the case for albumin, some acute phase reactant pro teins such as C-reactive protein, a2-macroglobulin, ai-acid glycoprotein, haptoglobin, some coagulation proteins such as prothrom bin or fibrinogen and of ceruloplasmin and transferrin [1], However, even during this period, three observations did not fit well with these data: (1) when an increase in the hepatic synthesis of prothrombin [24], trans ferrin [25] or albumin [26] was induced, the percentage of hepatocytes engaged in the syn thesis of these three proteins increased strik ingly to shift from a small percentage to almost all hepatocytes; (2) inhibition of plasma protein secretion by microtubule-depolymerizing drugs, such as colchicine, which augment the amount of intracellular proteins, resulted in an increase in the num ber of fibrinogen-synthesizing hepatocytes [27], and (3) observation of serial liver sec tions clearly demonstrated that during an acute inflammatory reaction, the same hepa tocytes were able to synthesize at least four different acute phase reactant proteins at the same time [28], At the end of the 1970s, introduction of membrane-permeabilizing agents in immunocytochemistry completely changed the situation. As discussed pre As recalled in the introduction, hepato cytes, which synthesize the bulk of plasma proteins, are not specialized in the produc tion of a given plasma protein.…”