2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155972
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition in the Human Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Despite their indispensable roles in sensory processing, little is known about inhibitory interneurons in humans. Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials cannot be recorded non-invasively, at least in a pure form, in humans. We herein sought to clarify whether prepulse inhibition (PPI) in the auditory cortex reflected inhibition via interneurons using magnetoencephalography. An abrupt increase in sound pressure by 10 dB in a continuous sound was used to evoke the test response, and PPI was observed by inserting a w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it may be likely that the present paired-stimulation suppression reflects IPSPs of Martinotti cells in terms of latency. The results of Experiment 2 also support this notion, as the suppression showed a higher threshold as compared to short-latency suppression [23]. Martinotti cells show a high threshold to induce IPSPs and do not respond with low-frequency inputs [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, it may be likely that the present paired-stimulation suppression reflects IPSPs of Martinotti cells in terms of latency. The results of Experiment 2 also support this notion, as the suppression showed a higher threshold as compared to short-latency suppression [23]. Martinotti cells show a high threshold to induce IPSPs and do not respond with low-frequency inputs [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We recently developed a method for this purpose using the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of auditory evoked cortical responses [ 9 11 ]. It appears to serve as a tool to record IPSPs indirectly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a sound feature is abruptly changed in a continuous sound, change-specific cerebral responses are evoked that are clearly recorded by electroencephalograms [ 12 , 13 ] or magnetoencephalograms (MEG)[ 14 ]. Change-related brain activity is used as a test response that reflects postsynaptic events in the change-detecting circuit in the auditory cortex [ 11 ]. Similar to standard paradigms for the PPI of startle reflexes, a weak change in a sound feature is inserted before the test stimulus, which results in the suppression of the test response despite the weak change stimulus (prepulse) itself evoking no or only a weak response [ 9 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations