2020
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202020180477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition kinetics of digestive proteases for Anticarsia gemmatalis

Abstract: Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner, 1818 (Lepidoptera) is a major pest of soybean in the Brazil. It is known that the reduction of proteolytic activity by the ingestion of protease inhibitors reduces digestion and larval development of the insects. Control via inhibition of the digestive enzymes necessitates deeper knowledge of the enzyme kinetics and the characterization of the inhibition kinetics of these proteases, for better understanding of the active centers and action mechanisms of this enzyme. Trypsin-like p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the kinetic level, SKTI show lower inhibition constant (Ki) compared with those from synthetic inhibitors, which allow them to occupy all the binding sites available in the active centre of the enzyme and thus an optimised adjustment occurs in the enzyme‐inhibitor (EI) complex formation. The synthetic inhibitors, being smaller, do not occupy all the available sites of the enzyme, forming less stable EI complex (Meriño‐Cabrera, de Oliveira Mendes, et al, 2020; Meriño‐Cabrera, Severiche Castro, et al, 2020; Patarroyo‐Vargas et al, 2020; Volpicella et al, 2003). In this study, we found that protein synthesis is accompanied by changes in the insect's enzymes profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the kinetic level, SKTI show lower inhibition constant (Ki) compared with those from synthetic inhibitors, which allow them to occupy all the binding sites available in the active centre of the enzyme and thus an optimised adjustment occurs in the enzyme‐inhibitor (EI) complex formation. The synthetic inhibitors, being smaller, do not occupy all the available sites of the enzyme, forming less stable EI complex (Meriño‐Cabrera, de Oliveira Mendes, et al, 2020; Meriño‐Cabrera, Severiche Castro, et al, 2020; Patarroyo‐Vargas et al, 2020; Volpicella et al, 2003). In this study, we found that protein synthesis is accompanied by changes in the insect's enzymes profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, potency and specificity for different serine proteases can be attained by incorporating the small inhibitor benzamidine into larger and more complex synthetic inhibitors such as a bis-benzamidine, an active compound of Berenil ® . This inhibitor is an example of a synthetic trypsin inhibitor (Oliveira et al, 1993) but its potential effect as insecticide, repellent and antifeedant against pests has been poorly tested in comparison with the natural soybean inhibitor SKTI (Marinho-Prado et al, 2012;Patarroyo-Vargas et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory effect of the peptides (GORE1 and GORE2) was studied for 12 days at room temperature (25–30°C). All the experimental analyzes were compared with the known trypsin inhibitor Soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (SKTI), was used because it is a stable protein that under physiological conditions binds to the active site of tipsins of soybean pests such as A. gemmatalis and has been characterized by being a competitive inhibitor (Koide et al, 1973; Patarroyo‐Vargas et al, 2020). Three aqueous solutions (6.5 mg/ml) of inhibitors were prepared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%