Since its identification over one hundred years ago, atrial fibrillation has been shown to occur frequently in the general population and is now recognized as an important medical problem in developed societies. Three major hypotheses to explain cardiac rhythm disorders like atrial fibrillation have been proposed during this time and one of these three, impulse reentry has become predominate. The two other explanations, designated as focal source hypotheses, have been relegated to a secondary role in understanding arrhythmia. Despite widespread acceptance of the reentry hypothesis, however, current noninvasive anti-arrhythmic drugs based on this mechanism poorly prevent or reverse atrial fibrillation or other types of arrhythmia. One interpretation of this paradoxical clinical result is that mechanisms other than reentry initiate arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation in real-life settings. As a consequence, current non-invasive therapeutics may neither target nor effectively suppress important but unrecognized non-reentrant mechanisms that provoke clinical arrhythmia. We have found that challenging isolated non-automatic left atrial muscle, left ventricular papillary muscle, and perfused heart in sinus rhythm with an activator of the voltage-independent Orai calcium channels provokes high frequent tachycardia and fibrillation. Thus the Orais and related voltage-independent calcium channels may be unexpected sources of arrhythmia. This manuscript provides a a synopsis of the identification of atrial fibrillation as a clinical entity, b an overview of the development of the three current hypotheses for arrhythmia, and c our hypothesis that dysregulated voltage-independent calcium channels may be a fourth means to provoke electrical instability in heart muscle.