The cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) has a well-established role in appetite regulation. Central CB1R antagonists, notably rimonabant, induced weight loss and improved the metabolic profile in obese individuals, but were discontinued due to psychiatric side-effects. The CB1R is also expressed peripherally, where its effects include promotion of liver fat accumulation, which consumes ATP. Type 2 diabetes in obese subjects is linked to excess liver fat, whilst there is a negative correlation between hepatic ATP content and insulin resistance. A decreased hepatic ATP/AMP ratio increases food intake by signals via the vagus nerve to the brain. The hepatic cannabinoid system is highly upregulated in obesity, and the effects of hepatic CB1R activation include increased activity of lipogenic and gluconeogenic transcription factors. Thus, blockade of hepatic CB1Rs could contribute significantly to the weight-reducing and insulin-sensitizing effects of CB1R antagonists. Additionally, upregulation of the hepatic CB1R may contribute to chronic liver inflammation, fibrosis and cirrhosis from causes including obesity, alcoholism and viral hepatitis. Peripheral CB1R antagonists induce weight loss and metabolic improvements in obese rodents; however, as there is evidence that hepatic CB1Rs are predominately intracellular, due to high intrinsic clearance, many drugs may not effectively block these receptors and therefore have limited efficacy. Hepatoselective CB1R antagonists may be effective at reducing hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance and bodyweight in obese, diabetic patients, with far fewer side-effects than first-generation CB1R antagonists. Additionally, such compounds may be effective in treating inflammatory liver disease, such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, reducing the likelihood of disease progression to cirrhosis or cancer.
Hepatic energy state and its effects on food intakeThe cellular energy state is defined by adenine nucleotide levels. Healthy cells maintain a ratio of ATP to ADP of the order of 10:1. Cellular concentrations of ADP typically remain constant, while ATP and AMP levels deviate in reciprocal directions [1].Hepatic energy state influences food intake [2, 3]. For instance, infusion of various lipids and carbohydrates into the hepatic portal vein of rodents was found to suppress food intake more effectively than administration of the same nutrients into the jugular vein [2]. Supporting results were found when injecting the fructose analogue 2,5-anhydro-D-mannitol (2,5-AM) into the portal vein. In the liver, 2,5-AM is phosphorylated at the 1 and 6 positions, but not metabolized further, thus lowering the levels of free intracellular phosphates, which reduces the generation of ATP, whilst increasing its degradation by disinhibiting adenosine deaminase. The net result is a lower hepatocellular ATP concentration, which increases feeding [4]. Pretreatment with sodium phosphate prevents the decrease in liver ATP levels and the increase in feeding [5]. Administration of the amino-acid analogue L-ethionin...