2002
DOI: 10.1002/jbt.10026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by physostigmine analogs: Conformational mobility of cysteine loop due to the steric effect of the alkyl chain

Abstract: The effect of a series of physostigmine analogs on acetylcholinesterase activity was investigated. The second-order rate constant k(on) of the enzyme-inhibitor complex correlates with the conformational positioning of aromatic residues, especially Trp84, in the transition state complex. The van der Waals interactions are an important structural element of this conformational change. A transient mobility of the cysteine loop (Cys67-Cys94) was confined only to the presence of a significant steric effect. Even wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the binding of cage amines on PAS only depends on the bulkiness of the inhibitors [37], the δ value of 0.44 strongly suggests that the binding between PAS and protonated carbamates 1 occurs in the K S1 step (Figure 4). In other words, bulkily substituted inhibitors [7,40,41] are difficult to bind onto the narrow entrance (PAS) of the enzyme active site gorge [8][9][10] for the K S1 step. For K S2 step, the ρ * value of −0.4 implies that the binding of the carbamate carbonyl oxygen to OAH generates a partial positive charge on the carbamate carbonyl carbon (Figure 4), and the ψ value of 0.27 implies that hydrophobic inhibitors are easier to pass through the hydrophobic loop [31] of the enzyme active site gorge than hydrophilic inhibitors (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the binding of cage amines on PAS only depends on the bulkiness of the inhibitors [37], the δ value of 0.44 strongly suggests that the binding between PAS and protonated carbamates 1 occurs in the K S1 step (Figure 4). In other words, bulkily substituted inhibitors [7,40,41] are difficult to bind onto the narrow entrance (PAS) of the enzyme active site gorge [8][9][10] for the K S1 step. For K S2 step, the ρ * value of −0.4 implies that the binding of the carbamate carbonyl oxygen to OAH generates a partial positive charge on the carbamate carbonyl carbon (Figure 4), and the ψ value of 0.27 implies that hydrophobic inhibitors are easier to pass through the hydrophobic loop [31] of the enzyme active site gorge than hydrophilic inhibitors (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%