2011
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2010.0143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Aromatase andα-Amylase by Flavonoids and Proanthocyanidins fromSorghum bicolorBran Extracts

Abstract: We compared the ability of simple flavonoids and proanthocyanidins in Sorghum bicolor bran extracts to inhibit enzymes in vitro. In particular, aromatase is a target for breast cancer therapy, and inhibition of α-amylase can reduce the glycemic effect of dietary starches. Proanthocyanidin-rich sumac sorghum bran extract inhibited α-amylase at a lower concentration (50% inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀]=1.4 μg/mL) than did proanthocyanidin-free black sorghum bran extract (IC₅₀=11.4 μg/mL). Sumac sorghum bran extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCT (100% methanol extract from sorghum) used in this study was a stronger α-glucosidase inhibitor than the sorghum phenolic extract of Kim et al (2011) (IC 50 = 0.4 µg/ml versus 1.1-1.4 µg/ml), using a similar inhibition assay. However, the sorghum phenolic extracts of Kim et al (2011) (lowest IC 50 = 2.9 µg/ml) and Hargrove et al (2011) (1.4 µg/ml) were apparently far stronger α-amylase inhibitors than the SCT used in this study (554.5 µg/ml). The α-amylase inhibitory data are, however, not directly comparable.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Amylases By Sctcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The SCT (100% methanol extract from sorghum) used in this study was a stronger α-glucosidase inhibitor than the sorghum phenolic extract of Kim et al (2011) (IC 50 = 0.4 µg/ml versus 1.1-1.4 µg/ml), using a similar inhibition assay. However, the sorghum phenolic extracts of Kim et al (2011) (lowest IC 50 = 2.9 µg/ml) and Hargrove et al (2011) (1.4 µg/ml) were apparently far stronger α-amylase inhibitors than the SCT used in this study (554.5 µg/ml). The α-amylase inhibitory data are, however, not directly comparable.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Amylases By Sctcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Our results showed that the inhibitory activity of the tested plants against both α-glucosidase and pancreatic α-amylase was positively correlated with the total phenolic compounds contents. Similarly, some studies have shown that the inhibitory activities of plant-based extracts or products against α-glucosidase and pancreatic α-amylase can be linked to the total phenolic compounds and flavonoids contents [52,53]. These correlations may indicate the importance of phenolic compounds as mediators for the inhibitory effects of plant-based foods on α-amylase and α-glucosidase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(12) The lower starch digestibility reported for sorghum foods is not an intrinsic property of the sorghum starch granules themselves, but appears mainly to be a consequence of the interactions of the starch with the endosperm protein matrix, as well as with cell wall material and polyphenolic compounds, such as condensed tannins and flavonoids. (37)(38)(39)(40)(41) These interactions inhibit carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes, such as α-glucosidase and α-amylase, thereby lowering starch digestibility. (42) The presence of the protein matrix has also been associated with reduced starch gelatinization during cooking resulting in partially-gelatinized sorghum starch granules that may resist enzymatic degradation in vivo.…”
Section: Starchesmentioning
confidence: 99%