1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb09106.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Lymphocyte Capping and Transformation by Propranolol and Related Compounds

Abstract: 1 The effects of propranolol on phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)induced transformation of murine T lymphocytes and capping of anti-IgG on the surface of murine B lymphocytes have been examined. 2 A 50% inhibition of transformation was observed with 10-5 M propranolol, whereas a higher concentration, of the order of 10 -M propranolol was required to inhibit capping by 50%. The (+ ) and (-)-isomers of propranolol proved equipotent in these respects, and the relative potencies of selected analogues of propranolol (alpre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the experimental model, the concentration at which this membrane stabilizing effect becomes evident varies between 10-5 M (Anderton, Axford, Cohn, Marshall, Sprake, 1981) and 10-3 M (Seeman, 1972). D-Propranolol has the same membrane stabilizing effect as the L-isomer (Barrett & Cullum, 1968;Anderton et al 1981), but is 100 times less potent as a f-receptor blocker (Barrett & Cullum, 1968). shift of the orthodromic and antidromic input-output curves (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the experimental model, the concentration at which this membrane stabilizing effect becomes evident varies between 10-5 M (Anderton, Axford, Cohn, Marshall, Sprake, 1981) and 10-3 M (Seeman, 1972). D-Propranolol has the same membrane stabilizing effect as the L-isomer (Barrett & Cullum, 1968;Anderton et al 1981), but is 100 times less potent as a f-receptor blocker (Barrett & Cullum, 1968). shift of the orthodromic and antidromic input-output curves (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%