1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1986.tb00523.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of pupariation and adult development in Calliphora vomitoria treated with ivermectin

Abstract: Puparium formation and adult development in Calliphora vomitoria L. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) are seriously disrupted after treating final-stage larvae with ivermectin. Fifty 07o of larvae treated topically with 1.01/zg ivermectin 2 days before anticipated pupariation fail to form puparia, while the same response requires 2.24 #g given one day before pupariation. Permanent larvae so produced remain alive for up to 2weeks. Of the larvae that pupariate, there is disruption of adult development, leading to larval-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such sub-lethal effects on development following avermectin treatment have previously been reported in a number of insect species. Avermectin exposure has been shown to inhibit processes leading to pupariation and adult development in two other Dipteran species, the face fly Musca autumnalis (Meyer etal., 1980) and Calliphora vomitoria (Strong, 1986). Other sublethal effects such as anti-feeding behaviour and reproductive disturbances following avermectin exposure have also been reported (reviewed by Strong & Brown, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such sub-lethal effects on development following avermectin treatment have previously been reported in a number of insect species. Avermectin exposure has been shown to inhibit processes leading to pupariation and adult development in two other Dipteran species, the face fly Musca autumnalis (Meyer etal., 1980) and Calliphora vomitoria (Strong, 1986). Other sublethal effects such as anti-feeding behaviour and reproductive disturbances following avermectin exposure have also been reported (reviewed by Strong & Brown, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These are erroneous criteria and conceal the true extent to which avermectins are effective. In blowfly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae, metamorphosis or adult emergence are suppressed many days after topical application of ivermectin at doses much lower than those causing acute larval toxicity (McGarry, 1986a;Strong, 1986aStrong, , 1986bStrong, , 1989. The EC^, for 48 h larval toxicity in the dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria is 0.036 ppm (wet weight), but the EC,*, for adult emergence is only 0.001 ppm.…”
Section: Effects Of Avermectins On Dung-breeding Dipteramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Knowing the concentrations of avermectins and their various metabolites in dung after different dosing regimes allows controlled laboratory tests to be designed to define the impact of the drugs in the same way that topical applications have been assessed in other studies (McGarry, 1986a(McGarry, , 1986b(McGarry, , 1988Strong, 1986aStrong, , 1986b. Few analyses of avermectin concentrations have been published, with the exception of an early report that ivermectin is eliminated in cattle faeces at 0.353 ppm during the first week after injection (Merck et al, 1983).…”
Section: Levels Of Ivermectin In the Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown ivermectin to affect insect development and physiology (e.g. Strong, 1986;Clarke & Ridsdill-Smith, 1990;Cook, 1991;Strong & James, 1992;Gover & Strong, 1995;Krüger & Scholtz, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth mechanism may be the indirect effects of faecal residues on parasitoids mediated by changes in host quality. Ivermectin can prolong development (Strong, 1986), elevate asymmetry (Clarke & Ridsdill-Smith, 1990;Strong & James, 1992), and reduce the fecundity (Cook, 1991;Gover & Strong, 1995;Krüger & Scholtz, 1995) of coprophilous insects. The development and behaviour of parasitoids is influenced by differences (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%