2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of serotonin transport by (+)McN5652 is noncompetitive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As f p is not measurable for the [ 11 C]McN 5652 radioligand, we cannot exclude the possibility of differences in f p between groups. The results reported here cannot be explained by differences in intrasynaptic 5-HT concentrations, as the [ 11 C]McN 5652 radioligand does not appear to be sensitive to endogenous neurotransmitter levels (Hummerich et al, 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As f p is not measurable for the [ 11 C]McN 5652 radioligand, we cannot exclude the possibility of differences in f p between groups. The results reported here cannot be explained by differences in intrasynaptic 5-HT concentrations, as the [ 11 C]McN 5652 radioligand does not appear to be sensitive to endogenous neurotransmitter levels (Hummerich et al, 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This is an especially important consideration in our attempts to study 5-HT, as a radiotracer of equivalent value as [ 11 C]raclopride has been to dopamine has not yet been identified (for review see Paterson et al, 2010 (Paterson et al 2010)). For example, [ 11 C]McN5652 BP ND presumably reflects 5-HTT density and/or affinity because[ 11 C]McN5652 is not displaced from 5-HTT sites by physiologically relevant 5-HT concentrations (Hummerich et al 2006, Meyer 2007). Therefore, [ 11 C]McN5652 BP ND appears to remain relatively unaffected by endogenous 5-HT (Hummerich et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [ 11 C]McN5652 BP ND presumably reflects 5-HTT density and/or affinity because[ 11 C]McN5652 is not displaced from 5-HTT sites by physiologically relevant 5-HT concentrations (Hummerich et al 2006, Meyer 2007). Therefore, [ 11 C]McN5652 BP ND appears to remain relatively unaffected by endogenous 5-HT (Hummerich et al 2006). One model, as suggested by Meyer et al (Meyer 2007), proposes a clearance effect of 5-HTT, with less functioning 5-HTT associated with greater extracellular 5-HT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,13,14 As a result, b-CIT binding to 5-HTT can be assessed only in brain areas where dopamine transporters are rare and where the radioligand is displaced exclusively by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 3,9,10,15 Using [ 11 C]McN, a positron emission tomography (PET) ligand with selective affinity for 5-HTT that is assumed to be not displaceable by endogenous serotonin, 16 Parsey et al 17 observed reduced midbrain and amygdala 5-HTT availability in a group of 25 patients with major depression, while Ichimiya et al 18 reported unaltered [ 11 C]McN binding in the midbrain and increased binding in the thalamus in 7 patients with major depression. The 5-HTT ligand [ 11 C]-3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethylphenylsulfanyl)-benzonitrile (DASB) is reported to have a better signal-to-noise ratio than [ 11 C]McN, 19 also binds selectively to 5-HTT 20 and is also assumed to measure 5-HTT availability independent from synaptic levels of endogenous serotonin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%