1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1910(73)90074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of sexual response in males of the moth Argyrotaenia velutinana by brief exposures to synthetic pheromone or its geometrical isomer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those obtained with A. velutinana, where LLA could not be measured by EAG 1 min after 1-h preexposures with 100 mg of neat (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Stelinski et al 2003b). However, normal behavioral responsiveness to pheromone in both G. molesta Baker 1992, Rumbo andVickers 1997) and A. velutinana (Bartell and Roelofs 1973) is reduced for prolonged periods after pheromone exposures similar to the ones performed in our EAG studies, suggesting that habituation of the central nervous system occurs. Similar results have recently been obtained with C. pomonella in which behavioral responsiveness to pheromone was reduced 4 times longer than electrophysiological responsiveness (Judd et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are similar to those obtained with A. velutinana, where LLA could not be measured by EAG 1 min after 1-h preexposures with 100 mg of neat (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Stelinski et al 2003b). However, normal behavioral responsiveness to pheromone in both G. molesta Baker 1992, Rumbo andVickers 1997) and A. velutinana (Bartell and Roelofs 1973) is reduced for prolonged periods after pheromone exposures similar to the ones performed in our EAG studies, suggesting that habituation of the central nervous system occurs. Similar results have recently been obtained with C. pomonella in which behavioral responsiveness to pheromone was reduced 4 times longer than electrophysiological responsiveness (Judd et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Delineating the primary versus secondary mechanism(s) will aid in the development of pheromone technologies for practical use. The likelihood of effectiveness for a pheromone product is enhanced by knowing how it achieves mating disruption in the Þeld.Continuous and pulsed exposure to pheromone decreases behavior and electrophysiological responsiveness in many moth species (Bartell and Roelofs 1973; Bartell and Lawrence 1976a, b, c;Linn and Roelofs 1981;Kuenen and Baker 1981;Sanders 1985;Rumbo and Vickers 1997;Schmitz et al 1997;Daly and Figueredo 2000). Typically, this effect, termed adaptation, is dosage-dependent and reversible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the semiochemical release rate is increased, it is apparent that the active space increases in area as well as the varied CP values, all of which would be impractical to measure. The semiochemical release rate can be increased to a point that adaptation or confusion occurs with little catch (Bartell and Roelofs 1973;Baker and Roelofs 1981;Kuenen and Baker 1981;Baker et al 1989;Rumbo and Vickers 1997;Judd et al 2005). In this case, the active space should move a distance downwind from Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted examining male moth antennal and behavioral responses to pheromone for both the redbanded leafroller (Bartell & Roelofs, 1973, 1976Cardé & Roelofs, 1977;Novak & Roelofs, 1985;El-Sayed et al, 2003;Stelinski et al, 2003aStelinski et al, , b, 2004a and obliquebanded leafroller moths (Evenden et al, 2000;Stelinski et al, 2003aStelinski et al, , b, 2004a. Some of these investigations have suggested that high-dosage exposure of male moths to their pheromone blend components decreases subsequent responses of male moths due to adaptation, habituation, or a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these investigations have suggested that high-dosage exposure of male moths to their pheromone blend components decreases subsequent responses of male moths due to adaptation, habituation, or a combination of both. This decreased responsiveness following previous exposure has been implicated as a potential contributing factor to mating disruption (Bartell & Roelofs, 1973;Evenden et al, 2000;Stelinski et al, 2004a). Despite great attention to the effects of pheromone exposure on male moth behavior, similar effects on the responses of conspecific female moths have not been investigated in depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%