2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of the antiproliferative effect of TGFβ by EGF in primary human ovarian cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not due to functional mutations in the TGF-h receptors or Smads, as these occur infrequently (16,35,36). It has also been suggested that other factors, such as epidermal growth factor, abrogate the antiproliferative effect of TGF-h in vivo (37). Our data suggest that it is altered gene expression of TGF-h pathway genes that may account for the resistance of ovarian cancer to the antiproliferative effects of TGF-h. Several other studies have shown that it is not alterations in gene expression of TGF-h pathway genes that are responsible for the resistance of ovarian cancer to the antimitogenic effects of TGF-h but rather blockage of this pathway downstream of the Smad complex formation (12,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It is not due to functional mutations in the TGF-h receptors or Smads, as these occur infrequently (16,35,36). It has also been suggested that other factors, such as epidermal growth factor, abrogate the antiproliferative effect of TGF-h in vivo (37). Our data suggest that it is altered gene expression of TGF-h pathway genes that may account for the resistance of ovarian cancer to the antiproliferative effects of TGF-h. Several other studies have shown that it is not alterations in gene expression of TGF-h pathway genes that are responsible for the resistance of ovarian cancer to the antimitogenic effects of TGF-h but rather blockage of this pathway downstream of the Smad complex formation (12,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…EGF blocked Smad2/3 nuclear translocation in HaCat cells only when the TGFβ1 concentration was relatively low (Lo et al, 2001). Moreover, EGF had no effect on TGFβ1-mediated nuclear translocation of Smad2 in primary human cancer cells (Dunfield and Nachtigal, 2003). EGF did not block TGFβ1-mediated nuclear translocation of Smad2 in OKF6 cells at 1 hour, irrespective of the TGFβ1 treatment dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) prevents, via ERK1/2, TGFβ1-mediated loss of E-cadherin in human proximal tubular epithelial cells (Yang et al, 2005). In addition, EGF blocks TGFβ1-mediated antiproliferative effects on primary human ovarian cells (Dunfield and Nachtigal, 2003). Overall, growth factor signaling in these particular examples abrogates the effect of TGFβ1 to maintain the cells in a more 'epithelial' state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGF also inhibits the TGFβ pathway through phosphorylation of Smad2/3 in the linker region, preventing nuclear translocation (Kretzschmar et al, 1999). EGF can also counteract the cytostatic effect of TGFβ by interfering with its ability to activate CDKI p15 INK4b (Dunfield and Nachtigal, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%