1982
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1982.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of the Pial Artery Constriction Induced by Sympathetic Stimulation by Local Microapplication of a Cholinomimetic Agent

Abstract: Summary:We studied the effects of microapplications of carbachol plus at ropine on cat pial artery diameter in vivo during resting conditions and during stimulation of the cervical sympathetic nerve, The cats were anesthetized with a-chloralose and artificially ventilated. The pial surface was exposed by trepa nation and protected by a 1-2-cm layer of oil. Calibrated applications of solu tions were made by micropipette into the subarachnoid space, while the pial artery diameter was measured by the television i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimu lation of the sympathetic fibers, at the level of the superior of sensory fibers to the brain vessels in rat has also been shown to cause a minor increase in CBF ipsilaterally [8], Removal of the parasympathetic or sensory nerves does not affect resting blood flow [7][8][9][10][11][12], There is evidence for a close anatomical interrelation ship among these fiber types in the pial vessels, both as identical courses along the vascular branches [13][14][15] and at the terminal level [14,16,17]. Pharmacological experi ments indicate that cholinergic receptors are located on sympathetic nerve terminals [18][19][20][21]. Some of these stud ies claim that acetylcholine blocks the release of noradren aline [18,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stimu lation of the sympathetic fibers, at the level of the superior of sensory fibers to the brain vessels in rat has also been shown to cause a minor increase in CBF ipsilaterally [8], Removal of the parasympathetic or sensory nerves does not affect resting blood flow [7][8][9][10][11][12], There is evidence for a close anatomical interrelation ship among these fiber types in the pial vessels, both as identical courses along the vascular branches [13][14][15] and at the terminal level [14,16,17]. Pharmacological experi ments indicate that cholinergic receptors are located on sympathetic nerve terminals [18][19][20][21]. Some of these stud ies claim that acetylcholine blocks the release of noradren aline [18,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacological experi ments indicate that cholinergic receptors are located on sympathetic nerve terminals [18][19][20][21]. Some of these stud ies claim that acetylcholine blocks the release of noradren aline [18,20,21]. There is physiopharmacological evi dence in cat for an interaction between the sympathetic and sensory nerves in pial arterioles: the vasoconstrictor action of noradrenaline is prolonged after sectioning of the trigeminal nerve [9], which may indicate that the tri geminal cerebrovascular nerves provide a reflex mecha nism to overcome reductions in CBF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as in dicated above, there appeared to be no significant uptake of 5-HT by sympathetic nerves in our experimental conditions. In addition, the presynaptic choline@ receptors on sympathetic nerve terminals inhibit norepinephrine release (3,13,31). Because norepinephrine and 5-HT are probably stored (6) and released together (23,32), cholinergic stimulation of sympathetic nerve terminals would tend to decrease 5-HT efflux rather than increase it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High concentrations (10-4-10-3 M) of nicotine have been found to dilate extraparenchymal cerebral arteries directly when applied the perivascular space (Wahl and Kuschinsky 1977a). Furthermore, nicotine acting on prejunctional receptors of postganglionic sympathetic cerebrovascular fibres may inhibit the release of norepinephrine (Edvinsson et al 1977) and thus reduce the vasoconstrictor response (Aubineau et al 1980;Sercombe and Wahl 1982). The latter appears to be specific to the cerebral circulation since in other organs the release of norepinephrine from perivascular nerves is facilitated by prejunctional nicotinic receptors but inhibited by prejunctional muscarinic receptors (Muscholl 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%