“…Then, from the 3D reconstructed images, spines were classified and counted according to morphological criteria based on spine length (SL), neck length (NL), neck diameter (ND), head diameter (HD) and the number of protrusions from a single stalk (Dall'Oglio, Dutra, Moreira, & Rasia‐Filho, ; Zancan et al., and references therein). Based on their shapes, spines were classified into the following: (a) thin (when SL > HD and HD > ND), (b) mushroom‐like (HD ≫ ND), (c) stubby/wide (HD > SL), (d) ramified (with a single stalk that branches in two heads) or (e) atypical (when showing a transitional aspect between classes or an unusual shape not classified in the other classes (based on Arellano, Benavides‐Piccione, DeFelipe, & Yuste, ; Brusco et al., , ; Dall'Oglio et al., ; Harris et al., ; Stewart, Popov, Kraev, Medvedev, & Davies, ; Zancan et al., and references therein). Representative examples are shown in Figures and .…”