1971
DOI: 10.2307/1588396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory Effect of Used Litter on Salmonella typhimurium Transmission in the Chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In pen trials, used litter contaminated with S. Typhimurium did not cause transfer to newly placed chickens and the New Litter, N1 and N2 Salmonella in the litter could not be detected in 3-5 days (Olesiuk, Snoeyenbos, & Smyser, 1971). It has been shown that Salmonella does not persist as long in old poultry litter as in fresh litter (Fanelli, Sadler, & Brownell, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In pen trials, used litter contaminated with S. Typhimurium did not cause transfer to newly placed chickens and the New Litter, N1 and N2 Salmonella in the litter could not be detected in 3-5 days (Olesiuk, Snoeyenbos, & Smyser, 1971). It has been shown that Salmonella does not persist as long in old poultry litter as in fresh litter (Fanelli, Sadler, & Brownell, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recognizing the importance of the litter environment, especially in commercial broiler houses with high stocking densities, several research groups have investigated how the physiochemical properties of broiler litter affect the growth and health of the birds (15) and the microbiota in the litter, using either cultivationbased or molecular biology techniques (22,23,33). Early studies focused on the effect of litter on enteric pathogens, including Salmonella (35,12,28) and cellulitis-causing Escherichia coli (38). From analyzing 16S rRNA gene clone libraries, Lu et al (23) showed that in broiler litter at various stages of reuse, low-GϩC Gram-positive bacteria predominated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benefit using ELISA was less clear with cloacal swabs. As litter is bactericidal to Salmonellae (OLESIUK et al, 1971), it is possible that numerous dead bacterial cells were present in the litter. Because the ELISA test detects Salmonella antigen, it is possible that these dead bacterial cells contributed to positive absorption values, while bacterial growth was not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%