2018
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271818440121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneities in the light curves of gamma-ray bursts afterglow

Abstract: We discuss the inhomogeneous behavior of gamma-ray burst afterglow light curves in optic. We use well-sampled light curves based on mostly our own observations to find and identify deviations (inhomogeneities) from broken power law. By the inhomogeneous behavior we mean flashes, bumps, slow deviations from power law (wiggles) in a light curve. In particular we report parameters of broken power law, describe phenomenology, compare optical light curves with X-ray ones and classify the inhomogeneities. We show th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling depends on the goal of investigation, and in case of GRB typical variability scale is about 0.1 s in the phase of prompt emission and seems to be independent of time since GRB trigger at the prompt phase (Mitrofanov et al 1998). The scale of variability increases linearly with time at the afterglow phase (e.g., (Mazaeva et al 2018)), so typical time sampling after tens minutes could be minute and it corroborates the necessity of exposure duration of about one minute to have a sufficient sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling depends on the goal of investigation, and in case of GRB typical variability scale is about 0.1 s in the phase of prompt emission and seems to be independent of time since GRB trigger at the prompt phase (Mitrofanov et al 1998). The scale of variability increases linearly with time at the afterglow phase (e.g., (Mazaeva et al 2018)), so typical time sampling after tens minutes could be minute and it corroborates the necessity of exposure duration of about one minute to have a sufficient sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constraint on θ j corresponds to a beaming-corrected isotropic energy in the γ-ray band of E γ = E γ,iso (1 − cos θ j ) = 6.0 1.8 −0.5 × 10 51 erg (Chattopadhyay et al 2019). The study of the inhomogeneities in the optical light curves of GRB afterglows of Mazaeva et al (2018) shows that the early ( 0.5 d) optical afterglow of GRB 160131A is characterised by a broken power law with small-scale deviations (wiggles), followed a steep decay, suggestive of a jet break at t j = 1.2 ± 0.3 d.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constrain on θ j corresponds to a beaming-corrected isotropic energy in the γ-ray band of E γ = E γ,iso (1 − cos θ j ) = 6.0 1.8 −0.5 × 10 51 erg, (Chattopadhyay et al 2019). The study of the inhomogeneities in the optical light curves of GRB afterglows of Mazaeva et al (2018) shows that the early ( 0.5 d) optical afterglow of GRB 160131A is characterised by a broken power-law with small scale deviations (wiggles), followed a steep decay, suggestive of a jet break at t j = 1.2 ± 0.3 d.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%