2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.09090
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous Knight shift in vortex cores of superconducting FeSe

I. Vinograd,
S. P. Edwards,
Z. Wang
et al.

Abstract: We report 77 Se NMR data in the normal and superconducting states of a single crystal of FeSe for several different field orientations. The Knight shift is suppressed in the superconducting state for in-plane fields, but does not vanish at zero temperature. For fields oriented out of the plane, little or no reduction is observed below Tc. These results reflect spin-singlet pairing emerging from a nematic state with large orbital susceptibility and spin-orbit coupling. The spectra and spin-relaxation rate data… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, there exist experimental results on superconducting FeSe, which also crystallizes in a P4/nmm structure, that suggest similar considerations apply. In particular, Knight shift measurements indicate that there is no change in the spin susceptibility upon entering the superconducting state for the field applied along the c-axis [25,26]. Within the framework we have discussed here, this could be explained by a nearly-vanishing g-factor for a c-axis Zeeman field due to strong spin-orbit coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Remarkably, there exist experimental results on superconducting FeSe, which also crystallizes in a P4/nmm structure, that suggest similar considerations apply. In particular, Knight shift measurements indicate that there is no change in the spin susceptibility upon entering the superconducting state for the field applied along the c-axis [25,26]. Within the framework we have discussed here, this could be explained by a nearly-vanishing g-factor for a c-axis Zeeman field due to strong spin-orbit coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%