2019
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s187381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhospital death is a biased measure of fatal outcome from bloodstream infection

Abstract: PurposeInhospital death is commonly used as an outcome measure. However, it may be a biased measure of overall fatal outcome. The objective of this study was to evaluate inhospital death as a measure of all-cause 30-day case fatality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI).Patients and methodsA population-based surveillance cohort study was conducted, and patients who died in hospital within 30 days (30-day inhospital death) were compared with those who died in any location by day 30 post BSI diagnosis (3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can cautiously compare our results to those from previously published population-based studies, but it is important to note that the studies are from different time periods and populations, and the studies used a variety of mortality definitions. In-hospital mortality has been shown to be a biased measure of mortality at a general population-level [ 25 ] and is likely influenced by factors associated with health system and healthcare delivery. Regional-population based studies from Canberra (Australia; 2000–2004; in-hospital 7-day mortality), Calgary (Canada; 2000–2006; in-hospital), mid-Norway (Norway; 2002–2013; 30-day), Auckland (New Zealand; 2005–2011; in-hospital), and two Thai provinces (Thailand; 2008–2014; in-hospital) reported case fatality risks of 5, 11, 8.6, 9, and 8.9%, respectively [ 6 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can cautiously compare our results to those from previously published population-based studies, but it is important to note that the studies are from different time periods and populations, and the studies used a variety of mortality definitions. In-hospital mortality has been shown to be a biased measure of mortality at a general population-level [ 25 ] and is likely influenced by factors associated with health system and healthcare delivery. Regional-population based studies from Canberra (Australia; 2000–2004; in-hospital 7-day mortality), Calgary (Canada; 2000–2006; in-hospital), mid-Norway (Norway; 2002–2013; 30-day), Auckland (New Zealand; 2005–2011; in-hospital), and two Thai provinces (Thailand; 2008–2014; in-hospital) reported case fatality risks of 5, 11, 8.6, 9, and 8.9%, respectively [ 6 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mortality rates for other causes of BSIs presented below were calculated by multiplying the reported case fatality risk by the incidence rate [ 5 ] if they were not reported in the manuscript. If the definition of mortality was in-hospital mortality, then the mortality rate is an underestimate of the true population mortality rate [ 25 ]. For Staphylococcus aureus BSIs, studies from Finland (2004–2007, 30-day), Calgary (Canada, 2000–2006, in-hospital), and Skaraborg (Sweden, 2003–2005, 30-day) identified case fatality risks of 16.9, 25 and 19.1%, respectively, and mortality rates of 3.5, 4.9 and 5.9 deaths/100,000 person-years, respectively [ 1 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of these studies have been limited by small sample sizes [ 1 , 7 , 10 ], have been single centered [ 2 , 7 , 8 , 10 ], or have focussed on selected diagnoses or specific cohorts admitted to specialized ICUs [ 7 ]. In addition, while some national registry based studies have included very large sample sizes, they have been limited to acute care in-hospital outcomes only [ 3 , 23 ]. Our study benefits from its inclusion of a large number of admissions to four ICUs representing both tertiary referral and regional hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidities were recorded as per Charlson et al [15], and episodes were classified as community-associated, healthcare-associated, and hospital-onset as per Friedman et al [16]. Death at 30-days post index infection was determined using provincial vital statistics information [17].…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%