1989
DOI: 10.1080/09553008914551711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Damage or Repair as the Major Determinant of Cellular Radiosensitivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These sensitive neuroblastoma cell lines are certainly not recovery deficient and therefore may not be deficient in repair of DNA lesions. In this regard the neuroblastoma cells differ from ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts which, although they are similarly radiosensitive, show less recovery after irradiation than their normal counterpart (Cox, 1982;Peacock et al, 1989). The results that we have obtained indicate the contrast between 'recovery capacity' (which we would identify with the value of P) and 'dose recovery' in a fractionation or low dose-rate treatment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…These sensitive neuroblastoma cell lines are certainly not recovery deficient and therefore may not be deficient in repair of DNA lesions. In this regard the neuroblastoma cells differ from ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts which, although they are similarly radiosensitive, show less recovery after irradiation than their normal counterpart (Cox, 1982;Peacock et al, 1989). The results that we have obtained indicate the contrast between 'recovery capacity' (which we would identify with the value of P) and 'dose recovery' in a fractionation or low dose-rate treatment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…These have been proposed to be due to differences in non-protein thiol levels (Malaise, 1983), but radiochemical considerations suggest that this is unlikely (Ward, 1990). Radiation hypersensitive AT5BIVA cells do not exhibit increased initial damage (Peacock et al, 1989); instead their radiation sensitivity is considered to be due to a recombination defect (Taylor et al, 1994). Their inclusion in this study was prompted by a desire to provide a contrast to the other cell lines, since the (presuimably) fundamentally different mechanism governing their radiosensitivity should provide an exception to any relationship with GSH we observe in the other cell lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA double strand breaks (dsbs) are considered to be closely related to cell death because it is suggested that they can lead directly to chromosome aberration and the loss of genetic material [22]. To date, the correlation between radiosensitivity and DNA damage in many tumor cell lines has been studied [25,[27][28][29][30][31]36]. The various experimental approaches used for the detection of DNA strand breaks are filter elution, constant field gel electrophoresis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and the comet assay [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%