2012
DOI: 10.3893/jjaam.23.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial diagnosis of patients with numbness in the emergency room: study of diagnostic accuracy for dangerous causes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this report, the rate of positive abnormal finding on plain head CT was 4.6% and the rate of CT needed to change treatment plans was 0.9% among 2,943 plain head CT scans performed. The incidence of overlooking head CT scan findings in particular was low maybe because the incidence of abnormal findings on head CT is originally low 10–16 . Further studies, for instance, on how many orders of CT or MRI can be reduced or what kind of clinical improvements is achieved by changing examinations, are expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this report, the rate of positive abnormal finding on plain head CT was 4.6% and the rate of CT needed to change treatment plans was 0.9% among 2,943 plain head CT scans performed. The incidence of overlooking head CT scan findings in particular was low maybe because the incidence of abnormal findings on head CT is originally low 10–16 . Further studies, for instance, on how many orders of CT or MRI can be reduced or what kind of clinical improvements is achieved by changing examinations, are expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The incidence of overlooking head CT scan findings in particular was low maybe because the incidence of abnormal findings on head CT is originally low. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Further studies, for instance, on how many orders of CT or MRI can be reduced or what kind of clinical improvements is achieved by changing examinations, are expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%