2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial estimation of the in vivo material properties of the seated human buttocks and thighs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic error also suggests that, in addition to the choice of the geometric approximation of the ischial tuberosity, other factors involved in the definition and measurement of the principal shear strain in the local FE model might be lacking, their identification requiring further work. Second, the extraction of the material properties using an inverse identification method (for which the optimal parameters are obtained by minimizing the distance between experimental measures and numerical results), although popular for lower limb soft tissues (Affagard et al, 2015;Frauziols et al, 2016;Macron et al, 2018;Rohan et al, 2014;Sadler et al, 2018), is not compatible with clinical implementation because of lengthy solver times for the models and the need for a trained user to develop and interpret the FE model. Ultrasound Elastography, and, in particular, Supersonic Shear Imaging (SSI) technique, is emerging as an innovative tool that could provide a quantitative evaluation of biomechanical properties of soft tissues (Eby et al, 2013;Gennisson et al, 2010;Haen et al, 2017;Vergari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic error also suggests that, in addition to the choice of the geometric approximation of the ischial tuberosity, other factors involved in the definition and measurement of the principal shear strain in the local FE model might be lacking, their identification requiring further work. Second, the extraction of the material properties using an inverse identification method (for which the optimal parameters are obtained by minimizing the distance between experimental measures and numerical results), although popular for lower limb soft tissues (Affagard et al, 2015;Frauziols et al, 2016;Macron et al, 2018;Rohan et al, 2014;Sadler et al, 2018), is not compatible with clinical implementation because of lengthy solver times for the models and the need for a trained user to develop and interpret the FE model. Ultrasound Elastography, and, in particular, Supersonic Shear Imaging (SSI) technique, is emerging as an innovative tool that could provide a quantitative evaluation of biomechanical properties of soft tissues (Eby et al, 2013;Gennisson et al, 2010;Haen et al, 2017;Vergari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the comparison could also be intricate due to differences in areas of indentation. Reported values of material parameters of the thigh soft tissues in the literature were equivalent to a shear modulus comprised between 1 kPa and 46 kPa and no values were reported concerning the exponent parameter [17,18,39]. As far as the authors are aware of, Affagard et al were the only ones to performed inverse FE modelling on the thigh [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purpose, analytical identifications of fused soft tissues material parameters of the thigh are also detailed afterwards. In particular, Sadler et al estimated material parameters of the posterior thigh tissues from experimental force-deflection data at three levels: distal, proximal and middle thigh [18]. Subjects were asked to sit on a chair instrumented with an indenter and a load cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, soft tissue distribution changes with different postures, especially the soft tissue of the buttocks with the flexion of both the hips and knees, like when seated. This position change, from supine to a seated posture, results in both anatomical and mechanical changes in the soft tissue [9,[16][17][18]. Second, evaluating unloaded soft tissue in a seated position for the buttocks and thighs is difficult, given that the body needs to be balanced and suspended with minimal pressure to image soft tissue while maintaining a neutral pelvis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%