2018
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Experience Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging During a Trans-Sulcal Tubular Retractor Approach for the Resection of Deep-Seated Brain Tumors: A Case Series

Abstract: Combining iMRI with tubular brain retraction techniques is feasible and may improve the extent of resection of deep-seated intrinsic brain tumors that are incompletely visualized with the smaller surgical exposure of tubular retractors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering a median tumor depth of 6 mm in this sample of patients, tumors located further beneath the cortex may have worse surgical outcomes and presents a unique surgical challenge. This is corroborated by other studies using TScal with lesions located near the diencephalon resulted in decreased neurological symptom relief [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. More shallow lesions within the parenchyma may enable optimal preservation of critical white matter tracts, potentially explaining the high number of patients who experienced relief from neurological symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering a median tumor depth of 6 mm in this sample of patients, tumors located further beneath the cortex may have worse surgical outcomes and presents a unique surgical challenge. This is corroborated by other studies using TScal with lesions located near the diencephalon resulted in decreased neurological symptom relief [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. More shallow lesions within the parenchyma may enable optimal preservation of critical white matter tracts, potentially explaining the high number of patients who experienced relief from neurological symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, many lesions had significant reduction in large collections of vasogenic edema as noted in both illustrative cases, potentially enhancing functional recovery ( Figure 4 and Figure 5 ). With these factors in mind, the data represents similar or greater GTR and postoperative improvements when compared to other TScal literature [ 48 , 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…After the removal of duplicates, 108 articles were eligible for screening. A total of 86 articles met the selection criteria [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubular retractors have been implemented for the resection of deep-seated metastases. Depending on the surgeon’s experience, operative microscopes (OMs), 45 exoscopes, 44 , 46 , 47 endoscopes, 41 , 45 intraoperative MRI, 48 and intraoperative ultrasound 49 may be used with tubular-retractor-assisted resection of BMs. Though most commonly utilized for subcortical and periventricular lesions, tubular retractors can also facilitate high-efficacy, low-morbidity resection of brain metastases in the posterior fossa.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%