2018
DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial experience using superflab as intravaginal packing during interstitial brachytherapy for advanced gynecologic cancer

Abstract: PurposeInterstitial brachytherapy implemented for locally advanced gynecologic cancer can result in toxicity due to the proximity of organs at risk (OAR). We report our experience using superflab bolus as vaginal packing to displace OAR during interstitial brachytherapy.Material and methodsTwelve patients with stage IB-IVA gynecologic cancer were treated with definitive chemoradiation including interstitial brachytherapy. A Syed template was used for a computed tomography (CT)-based pre-plan with magnetic reso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie -European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology have recommended the optimal prescription doses for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) (7,8). The use of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) allows the delivery of sufficient doses to the CTV, while respecting dose constraints of the OARs (9). Therefore, IGABT offers better LC than conventional ICBT, which delivers the prescribed dose to point A (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie -European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology have recommended the optimal prescription doses for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) (7,8). The use of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) allows the delivery of sufficient doses to the CTV, while respecting dose constraints of the OARs (9). Therefore, IGABT offers better LC than conventional ICBT, which delivers the prescribed dose to point A (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%