2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0246-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial experience with magnetic resonance fluoroscopy in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Comparison with manometry and barium fluoroscopy

Abstract: The aim of this paper was to assess the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopy in the study of oesophageal motility disorders and to compare MR fluoroscopy results with those of manometry and barium contrast radiography. Twenty-five subjects referred for dysphagia and three patients in follow-up after pneumatic dilatation of the lower oesophageal sphincter to treat severe achalasia underwent esophageal manometry, barium contrast radiography and MR fluoroscopy. Examinations were performed on a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since now, different MR-fluoroscopy techniques have been introduced for the evaluation of esophageal functionality: in their paper [25], Barkhausen et al first discussed the characteristics of TrueFISP sequences for the dynamic visualization of pharynx and upper esophagus, while other authors lately proposed T1-weighted Fast Field Echo/Turbo Field Echo [16], Turbo-FLASH [17], and Dynamic Gradient-Echo sequences for the MR-fluoroscopy imaging of esophageal functionality. For the study of patients with NGT reconstruction of the esophagus, we chose to adopt T1-weighted Turbo-FLASH sequences basing on the encouraging results reported in the evaluation of esophageal functionality in subjects with motility disorders [17]; since a just compromise between temporal and spatial resolution (highest possible frame rate with sufficient spatial definition) is the most critical factor to perform proper MR-fluoroscopy imaging, our primary objective was to set low values of repetition time (TR = 600 ms), Flip Angle (FA = 88) and, consequentially, of sequence TA (50 s), maintaining at the same time an adequate matrix (125 Â 256). Several different mixtures have been proposed as oral contrast agent for MR-fluoroscopy, ranging from ferric-ammonium solutions [16], to semolina pudding [25], yoghurt [17], or water mixed with Gadolinium: the yoghurt/ Gadolinium mixture we used was an optimal solution providing excellent signal intensity with barium-like physical properties, and improving patient comfort with good compliance during examination.…”
Section: Our Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since now, different MR-fluoroscopy techniques have been introduced for the evaluation of esophageal functionality: in their paper [25], Barkhausen et al first discussed the characteristics of TrueFISP sequences for the dynamic visualization of pharynx and upper esophagus, while other authors lately proposed T1-weighted Fast Field Echo/Turbo Field Echo [16], Turbo-FLASH [17], and Dynamic Gradient-Echo sequences for the MR-fluoroscopy imaging of esophageal functionality. For the study of patients with NGT reconstruction of the esophagus, we chose to adopt T1-weighted Turbo-FLASH sequences basing on the encouraging results reported in the evaluation of esophageal functionality in subjects with motility disorders [17]; since a just compromise between temporal and spatial resolution (highest possible frame rate with sufficient spatial definition) is the most critical factor to perform proper MR-fluoroscopy imaging, our primary objective was to set low values of repetition time (TR = 600 ms), Flip Angle (FA = 88) and, consequentially, of sequence TA (50 s), maintaining at the same time an adequate matrix (125 Â 256). Several different mixtures have been proposed as oral contrast agent for MR-fluoroscopy, ranging from ferric-ammonium solutions [16], to semolina pudding [25], yoghurt [17], or water mixed with Gadolinium: the yoghurt/ Gadolinium mixture we used was an optimal solution providing excellent signal intensity with barium-like physical properties, and improving patient comfort with good compliance during examination.…”
Section: Our Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study of patients with NGT reconstruction of the esophagus, we chose to adopt T1-weighted Turbo-FLASH sequences basing on the encouraging results reported in the evaluation of esophageal functionality in subjects with motility disorders [17]; since a just compromise between temporal and spatial resolution (highest possible frame rate with sufficient spatial definition) is the most critical factor to perform proper MR-fluoroscopy imaging, our primary objective was to set low values of repetition time (TR = 600 ms), Flip Angle (FA = 88) and, consequentially, of sequence TA (50 s), maintaining at the same time an adequate matrix (125 Â 256). Several different mixtures have been proposed as oral contrast agent for MR-fluoroscopy, ranging from ferric-ammonium solutions [16], to semolina pudding [25], yoghurt [17], or water mixed with Gadolinium: the yoghurt/ Gadolinium mixture we used was an optimal solution providing excellent signal intensity with barium-like physical properties, and improving patient comfort with good compliance during examination. The combination of all these factors allowed real-time imaging of NGT functionality and morphology: the peculiar post-surgery changes occurring in patient with NGT reconstruction of the esophagus were correctly evaluated in all cases, yielding sufficient information to assign each patient to the corresponding score group.…”
Section: Our Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main limitation of SDV is the use of ionizing radiation while the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique offers the same information of radiology in absence of radiation [8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%