1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.1995.tb00540.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Experience with the “Big‐Skinny” Angioplasty Catheter

Abstract: We describe our initial experience with the "Big Skinny" angioplasty catheter, currently only available as an investigational device and in sizes of 4.5, 5, and 6 mm. Six patients with severe angina pectoris were successfully dilated with this angioplasty catheter and have remained asymptomatic up until a mean follow-up period of 6 months. However, because of the large profile of the catheter, sufficient back-up with an adequate guiding catheter should be obtained and predilation with a smaller angioplasty cat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, elderly patients are often excluded from clinical trials [Roth et al 2012]. Nevertheless, coronary angioplasty remains the treatment of choice for symptomatic CAD regardless of the patient's age [Bryniarski et al 2004;Chen et al 2010] and has been proven to be effective and safe for the elderly [Eeckhout et al 1996;Feliciano et al 2005]. Furthermore, elderly patients referred for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are likely to have higher risk profiles, comorbidities and in-hospital complications [Bossi et al 2006;Sukiennik et al 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, elderly patients are often excluded from clinical trials [Roth et al 2012]. Nevertheless, coronary angioplasty remains the treatment of choice for symptomatic CAD regardless of the patient's age [Bryniarski et al 2004;Chen et al 2010] and has been proven to be effective and safe for the elderly [Eeckhout et al 1996;Feliciano et al 2005]. Furthermore, elderly patients referred for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are likely to have higher risk profiles, comorbidities and in-hospital complications [Bossi et al 2006;Sukiennik et al 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%