2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0500-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair

Abstract: IntroductionNatural orifice surgery has evolved from a preclinical setting into a common occurrence at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). With close to 40 transvaginal cases, we have become comfortable with this technique and are exploring other indications. One of the perceived advantages in natural orifice surgery is the potential reduction in the incidence of hernia formation. Patients with abdominal wall hernias may be at increased risk of forming additional hernias at incision sites. In additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with other authors that a blind insertion of trocar transvaginally would be too uncertain or present unnecessary danger to the patient [5,13]. Safety has priority.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We agree with other authors that a blind insertion of trocar transvaginally would be too uncertain or present unnecessary danger to the patient [5,13]. Safety has priority.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In 2009, Jacobsen et al [5] published the first case report of NOTES IPOM, followed by Bruna [6]. Last year, Wood published a small case series of six pure transvaginal ventral hernia repair procedures performed between November 2010 and February 2012 [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…That same year, several reports of cholecystectomy using this technique were published worldwide (Branco Filho et al, 2007;Dolz et al, 2007;Zorrón et al, 2007). Since then, this access has been used to perform several procedures, including nephrectomy (Branco et al, 2008b;Castillo et al, 2009;Kaouk et al, 2010;Ribal Caparrós et al, 2009), tubal sterilization (Kondo et al, 2009), liver resection (Noguera et al, 2008), sleeve gastrectomy (Fischer et al, 2009;Ramos et al, 2008b), adjustable gastric banding (Michalik et al, 2010), incisional hernia repair (Jacobsen et al, 2010), cancer diagnostic staging (Zorrón et al, 2008), splenectomy (Targarona et al, 2009), retroperitoneoscopy (Zorron et al, 2010a) among others. More recently, some case series have been published (Alcaraz et al, 2010;Asakuma et al, 2009;Cuadrado-Garcia et al, 2011;Hackethal et al, 2010;Horgan et al, 2009;Lehmann et al, 2010;Niu et al, 2010;Noguera et al, 2009;Noguera et al, 2010;Palanivelu et al, 2008;Pugliese et al, 2010;Ramos et al, 2008a;Sotelo et al, 2010;Zornig et al, 2010a;Zornig et al, 2010b;Zorron et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Use Of the Flexible Endoscopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients seem to be early adopters of the technology, perhaps owing to a perception that surgical risk is related to incision size, whereas surgeons prefer to wait for more safety and efficacy outcome data. 32 Years after NOSCAR published the white paper on NOTES in 2005, and although various NOTES procedures have now been tested in humans, 25,26,[33][34][35][36] investigators continue to rely on animal models to better understand and overcome several of the barriers precluding NOTES from wide clinical adoption. In brief, we have shown the feasibility of transcolonic NOTES peritonoscopy and abscess drainage in a canine survival study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%