2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial-final mass relationship for stars of different metallicities

Abstract: Context. The initial-final mass relationship (IFMR) for stars is important in many astrophysical fields of study, such as the evolution of galaxies, the properties of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and the components of dark matter in the Galaxy. Aims. The purpose of this paper is to obtain the dependence of the IFMR on metallicity. Methods. We assume that the envelope of an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) or a first giant branch (FGB) star is lost when the binding energy of the envelope is equal to zero (ΔW = 0) a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
7
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Too long to compare with our simulation (see Fig. 1), the orbital period leads to a lower envelope binding energy than produced by the model developed in this paper since the binding energy of the envelope is determined mainly by the radius of the RG star (Meng et al 2008). The envelope of the RG model used by Marietta et al (2000) is then more likely to be stripped off and the amount of material stripped-off by the RG companion in Marietta et al (2000) might be overestimated.…”
Section: Interaction Between Supernova Ejectamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Too long to compare with our simulation (see Fig. 1), the orbital period leads to a lower envelope binding energy than produced by the model developed in this paper since the binding energy of the envelope is determined mainly by the radius of the RG star (Meng et al 2008). The envelope of the RG model used by Marietta et al (2000) is then more likely to be stripped off and the amount of material stripped-off by the RG companion in Marietta et al (2000) might be overestimated.…”
Section: Interaction Between Supernova Ejectamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, the amount of work necessary to eject completely the stellar envelopes of massive AGB stars is much higher and, even though our panels showing the binding energy profiles seem to point to the disruption of the star, we cannot discard an eventual fallback of the envelopes. We have calculated the envelope binding energy for the last computed models as Meng et al (2008), and obtained a result of −3 × 10 45 erg. This value is negative and, therefore technically the envelope still remains bound.…”
Section: What Will Happen To the Star?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a star evolves to the stage, its envelope may be lost if the binding energy (BE) of the envelope transforms from a negative phase to a positive one (Paczyński & Ziólkowski 1968; see also Fig. 2 in Meng et al 2008). We calculated the BE of the envelope to be…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assume that a star will lose its envelope when the BE of the star's envelope increases to the point of ΔW = 0 and the core mass at the point is the final WD mass. The method here is robust and its virtue is significant because we need not consider the specific mechanism of mass loss since the mass loss rate is very uncertainty (see Meng et al 2008, in details about this method). We assume that after envelope ejection the remnant is a CO WD if carbon and oxygen have not been ignited at the moment of envelope ejection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation