2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2007.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial image interpretation of appendicular skeletal radiographs: A comparison between nurses and radiographers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent to previous studies showing the ability of radiographers to improve their performance of interpretation after a short course of formal training 39,40 . The radiographers in this study produced a mean FOM of 0.920 (standard error 0.013, df 14, 95% CI 0.891,0.950).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results are consistent to previous studies showing the ability of radiographers to improve their performance of interpretation after a short course of formal training 39,40 . The radiographers in this study produced a mean FOM of 0.920 (standard error 0.013, df 14, 95% CI 0.891,0.950).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Radiographer ability to detect abnormalities has also been compared to A&E or Minor Injuries Unit (MIU) Nurses pre-and post-training. 21 Despite the reticence evidenced by the survey results, Radiographers with no initial training performed as well as Nurses who had had training. In one study, Radiographers underestimated their ability in image interpretation, whereas Nurse Practitioners and Casualty Officers overrated their abilities, again suggesting there may be issues with Radiographer confidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A single group pre-and post-test study was undertaken with an educational intervention [3,17,18]. There was a total sample (N ¼ 75) of radiographers employed at the two hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa, who were eligible to participate in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%