2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.02.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial layout of DEMO buildings and configuration of the main plant systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proposal of TL layout is being studied within the work package balance of plant (WPBoP) [19] to develop a suitable configuration of the plant system inside the tokamak building. The prescribed level of the stray magnetic field (SMF), in both radial and vertical directions at the gyrotron position, defines the minimum distance (120 m) between the RF buildings and DEMO hall [20].…”
Section: Tokamak Building Integration Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposal of TL layout is being studied within the work package balance of plant (WPBoP) [19] to develop a suitable configuration of the plant system inside the tokamak building. The prescribed level of the stray magnetic field (SMF), in both radial and vertical directions at the gyrotron position, defines the minimum distance (120 m) between the RF buildings and DEMO hall [20].…”
Section: Tokamak Building Integration Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behind all these will lie an integrated supply chain of human and industrial capability of a scale and diversity seldom seen. The DEMO building schematic is reprinted from [24], Copyright (2018), with permission from Elsevier. Safety and environmental issues deserve special mention as they are fundamental to the device architecture, size of components, choice of materials, design of many systems and design of the buildings to allow safe robotic movement of large, activated components around the plant.…”
Section: Major Science and Technology Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with FRAMATOME GmbH (formerly AREVA) for both options using either water or helium to remove the heat from the breeding blanket. These are useful to identify the major buildings and structures needed to contain the plant equipment (see [3,34] and references therein) and their main dimension characteristics. Figure 7 shows an elevation view of the plant and a comparison with the European pressurized reactor (EPR) design.…”
Section: Plant Equipment Buildings Preliminary Demo Plant Layout Conmentioning
confidence: 99%